Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Myrddin
Access times are faster.

As I understand it, although the access times are near instantaneous, the read times are quite slow. In other words, you get the first byte in a hurry, but it takes a long time to read a substantial number of consecutive bytes, so long that these devices are not suitable replacements for HDs in most applications even if the limited writes issue was resolved.

57 posted on 11/17/2007 2:30:45 PM PST by SergeiRachmaninov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: SergeiRachmaninov
Access times for FLASH memory are faster than CD or DVD ROMs when used in a navigation application. Sentence fragments are a bad way to convey an idea.

BTW, I was just at my local computer surplus retailer. He moves a lot of laptops that have been turned over by big corporations in an upgrade campaign. Most of them have smaller hard disks than are currently supplied with new laptops. He does a brisk business in updating them to a larger disk and more RAM to make them relevant. He was just informed that Seagate and Western Digital are bailing out of the parallel IDE laptop drive business in February. That's not good news given that 90% of current laptops use an IDE drive. The "also ran" suppliers e.g. Fujitsu may remain in the game, but he doesn't want any part of their products. He was financially burned by a run of bad 20GB laptop drives from Fujitsu. He ate the full retail value of over 300 of those bad drives.

59 posted on 11/17/2007 2:49:08 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson