Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HR 3648: Changing the Capital Gains Tax Exemption (Housing)
nuwireinvestor ^ | 10/16/2007 | Cali Zimmerman

Posted on 10/23/2007 3:08:44 PM PDT by taildragger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: taildragger

Cap gains ARE the same for RE & stocks...the $250K/$500K is the “primary residence exemption”.


21 posted on 10/23/2007 5:02:43 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (This post sold by weight, not volume. Content may have settled during shipment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

If this report is correct, “phantom gains” from the short sale of a mortgaged property will be exempt from income taxation.

Can’t tell from that article if this is for primary residences only, or all real property - if the latter it will help bail out flippers and developers, and will help clear the market of a lot of distressed “investment” properties.

OTOH, in either case holders of mortgage backed securities will be taking a considerable hit, and a lot of that paper is held by overseas investors, who will NOT be amused.


22 posted on 10/23/2007 5:13:17 PM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas (Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

The way I understand this is this...

Lots of people defaulting on sub-prime loans. Defaulted loans are taxed as income.

Congress is considering changing this and removing the ‘taxable income’ delineation and letting the loan defaulters off the hook.

They know this will cost a great deal of tax revenue. sooooo, what is their plan?!

Give the pie in the sky home buyers a freebie and once again stick it to the responsible members of society.


23 posted on 10/23/2007 6:24:43 PM PDT by Dad2Angels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StormEye

The middle class?

Please....

If you live in the house for 1 year and sell, you’ll get a prorated amount... so for a married couple, you still get capital gains exclusion of $100,000. How many middle class families have homes that increase in value by $100,000 in a single year? If it increases in value by any amount less than that, they still would pay nothing in capital gains taxes....

From 2004 to 2006, the fastest growing area in median prices was Honolulu, increasing by $170,000 over 2 years.

Meaning the median home in the fastest growing market in the country still would not have been subject to capital gains taxes.

The national median price went from $195.2 to $221.9 in the same period. Meaning nationally, the median home would have been nowhere near having taxable gains.

If the median home is nowhere near experiencing taxable limits, how is it going after the middle class?


24 posted on 10/24/2007 7:49:42 AM PDT by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

You said it - remember, her husband was the one that slapped us with the biggest retroactive tax increase in history.


25 posted on 10/24/2007 7:52:29 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson