Other people's children. . .other people's money. It is always the same. . .
. . .Liberalism imagines itself as an 'enforced charitiy' for the greater good. Coercive. . .corrosive application of what should be 'personal choice'; not collective enforcement of charitable ideals which by it's own inauthenticity, this charity is destined to be rendered, null and void.
Can feel this Lib's angst; as he make a private decision for his own son.
Doubt even yet, he really smells the coffee here. . .
“liberals” deride private charity because that money isn’t coercively being funnelled through the government.