Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Thompson And The Value Of 'Easy Does It'
Christian Science Monitor ^ | October 23, 2007 | Ralph Keyes

Posted on 10/22/2007 9:52:02 PM PDT by Doofer

Pundits and Democrats are making the same mistake with Fred Thompson that they did with Ronald Reagan and Dwight Eisenhower: underestimating him because he's not a workaholic. Mr. Reagan liked to joke that "They say hard work never killed anyone, but I figure, why take the chance?" Reagan also once observed of himself, "I've really been burning the midday oil." The same could be said of Mr. Thompson. To detractors, this is clear evidence of his limitations. It isn't.

Any wise manager knows that long hours are not synonymous with added productivity. It could be the other way around. Working too hard usually indicates that an executive is disorganized, can't manage time, and has problems delegating authority. That person stays up late and brings work home on weekends because he has to. But working overtime is hardly the same as working effectively. Typically, it's just the opposite.

One of Al Gore's weaknesses during the 2000 campaign was that he worked such long hours and had his fingers in so many pies that he seemed to lose sight of his overarching message. Mr. Gore was not good at delegating. He was more in the Jimmy Carter tradition. As president, Carter was notorious for being so loath to delegate authority that he brooded over schedules for the White House tennis courts.

For some reason this tendency seems to afflict Democrats more than Republicans. Democrats routinely confuse hyperactivity with achievement. This began when John Kennedy made such a fetish of contrasting his "vigor" with Ike's apparent indolence.

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; elections; fredthompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 10/22/2007 9:52:04 PM PDT by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Doofer

I met Reagan Fred is no Reagan


2 posted on 10/22/2007 9:55:57 PM PDT by al baby (Hi mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Reagan was remarkable.


3 posted on 10/22/2007 9:58:59 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: al baby

I can’t imagine Reagan voting against convicting Clinton either. Fred does not impress me, especially after finding his statement regarding the Senate vote to convict Clinton. I want someone who knows the VALUE OF KICKING EVIL IN THE ASS!! I just don’t see it in Fred, but boy did I ever see it in Reagan.


4 posted on 10/22/2007 10:01:07 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

Nice (apologist) piece for those who support Thompson. However, his energy level isn’t his only problem. Like the others, he, too, has been an imperfect conservative. Worst of all, people are having to find excuses for why Thompson seems half-dead. He’s no neo-Reagan. They used to comment on Reagan’s schedule, sharpness on every issue, rigor of his activity at his ranch. Even giving Thompson the advantage of the doubt, I didn’t think that he was that charismatic during the Sunday night debate. He had some good lines but it was easy to zone-out on him due to his slowness. He was on the verge of boring. It was like he wasn’t taking it that seriously. Vis-a-vis Hillary, he would look old and ineffectual. Even McCain, who is older, had more on the ball than Thompson. All in all, Thompson has been a big disappointment instead of the “winner” so many expected him to be. And...it’s showing up in his numbers and fund-raising.


5 posted on 10/22/2007 10:01:13 PM PDT by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

I remember ‘82 when inflation was coming down and unemployment going up and the tax cuts had passed and the media was going ballistic and Reagan held his ground. He had courage and principle.


6 posted on 10/22/2007 10:01:54 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

I remember it well....by 83, my real estate business doubled!


7 posted on 10/22/2007 10:03:36 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

Clinton was reportedly a hard worker.


8 posted on 10/22/2007 10:04:05 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

“Clinton was reportedly a hard worker”

So many pages.......so little time :-)


9 posted on 10/22/2007 10:05:11 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Fred’s philosophy:

Not sure I want the job, would take it if the American people want me to. (Shades of Gorge Washington).

I have provided you with a complete exposure of my personal beliefs. These beliefs have not change over the years.

What you see is what you get.

My life is an open book.

I will run if you think my beliefs are what you want.

If not, I will go fishn’

My kind of President.

That down-home “twang”, and his general, no nonsense, personality, says it all for me.

Very Reaganisk (?)


10 posted on 10/22/2007 10:09:28 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma
>>>>>>I can’t imagine Reagan voting against convicting Clinton either. Fred does not impress me, especially after finding his statement regarding the Senate vote to convict Clinton.

Get your facts striaght. Fred voted to convict Clinton. The obstruction of justice charge was defeated with 50 votes to 50 votes, with Fred voting for conviction. The perjury charge was defeated with 45 votes to 55 votes, including Thompson against. 67 votes are required to convict a POTUS on any single impeachment charge.

11 posted on 10/22/2007 10:10:36 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

Yeah all those little hard-workers like BJ and Hill and Congress really do a great job don’t they....slow and steady might be better than all the busy little socialist Dem bees....as well as the Repubs that work hard for their earmarks!


12 posted on 10/22/2007 10:10:53 PM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Apology for the triple entendre. ;O)


13 posted on 10/22/2007 10:12:33 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jellybean

ping


14 posted on 10/22/2007 10:12:59 PM PDT by Doofer (Fred Dalton Thompson For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Clinton was reportedly a hard worker.

Depends on whose "reporting" the "reportedly" was based, I guess. But his alleged late hours at the White House do prove the author's point: it's not how many hours you spend on the job, it's how much actual work was accomplished, vice wheel-spinning, dead horse flogging, "policy wonking" and mindless pontificating.

15 posted on 10/22/2007 10:14:05 PM PDT by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

Fact: Fred Thompson voted to convict Clinton and remove him from office.


16 posted on 10/22/2007 10:14:24 PM PDT by iowamark (FDT: Some think the way to beat the Democrats in November is to be more like them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pawdoggie
Don’t forget the wanking into Stephanopolis’s sink! That counts for work too. Not to mention all the time spent dodging Hillary’s spies! This while ignoring al Queda.
17 posted on 10/22/2007 10:18:17 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MHT

Nothing wrong with Fred`s energy level.

Nothing wrong with Fred`s conservatism either.

And like Reagan, Fred supports federalism. He wants to resurrect Reagan’s EO#12612, making the federal government adhere to the Framers idea of limited government and states rights.

All this stuff about Fred being tired, lazy and boring, shows a level of desperation by those people who don’t support Fred`s campaign.

Fred`s a winner. Fred can beat Rooty and take down Hillary. Wait and see.


18 posted on 10/22/2007 10:19:54 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Doofer
Did anyone see this one at Redstate earlier? I'm too tired to do a search.

It's Time For An Intervention

19 posted on 10/22/2007 10:20:14 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHT

see the Kindergarten Brigade has show up again full of irrelevant and immature posts about how candidates look, no fire in their belly, or their wives are too young.
Nothing of substance, nothing about the issues, just the ramblings of 4 year olds performing below grade average.

People who have to post this way because either their candidate sees Fred or other conservatives as a danger, or they are here to divide and conquer.

What you have probably not noticed, is that by and large, Free Republic is populated with members who have mastered critical thinking, who are mature, and do perform at and above grade-level and therefore, for the most part, find your infantile posts humorous at best.

Given the quality of your posting skills and associated cognitive abilities, you may want to visit www.democraticeunderground.com just a few doors down. People of like character flaws frequent this site and actually feel fulfilled!


20 posted on 10/22/2007 10:24:36 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson