Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 'cold civil war' in the U.S.: The common space required for civil debate...(MARK STEYN)
MacLean's, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ^ | 22 October 2007 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 10/22/2007 6:40:16 PM PDT by dufekin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last
To: Travis McGee

Good enough place to bump this thread.

Shades of 1860 indeed.


21 posted on 10/22/2007 7:41:52 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

And 1929, possibly. And in some ways, Spain before their civil war. With some Balkanization tossed in, Aztlan style.


22 posted on 10/22/2007 7:43:53 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Some on both sides fantasize this with the eagerness born of ignorance.

Well put. I've seen an awful lot of this on this very site.

23 posted on 10/22/2007 7:45:19 PM PDT by Publius (A = A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dufekin

This is the Amazon link to the novel that Steyn refers to that uses "Cold Civil War."


24 posted on 10/22/2007 7:49:55 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

No eagerness here, just dire warnings. A new CW would be a horror beyond imagining, combining elements of Spain in the 1930s and the Balkans of the 1990s. It would be a disaster. Don’t confuse warnings with desire, that is very foolish, similar to accusing the lookout on the Titanic of wanting to hit icebergs.


25 posted on 10/22/2007 7:53:01 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Rumor is that nader and paul have talked. You may be looking at this from the wrong direction.

LLS


26 posted on 10/22/2007 7:54:16 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dufekin
The separation between the conservative red states and the liberal blue cities is a profound chasm; the two sides increasingly operate off different perceptions of reality and different reasoning processes. The difference is as stark as night and day: capitalism versus socialism, Judeo-Christian morals versus atheistic moral relativism, American exceptionalism versus United Nations membership, victory as annihilation of terrorists versus victory as denial of terrorists.

You ever consider Steyn's line of work?

27 posted on 10/22/2007 7:57:45 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Very. But it feels nice to have coined the phrase 4 years before Gibson and Steyn.


28 posted on 10/22/2007 7:58:50 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Paul has not committed to supporting the Republican nominee. Indeed, he has sounded like he will not support the nominee unless he gets it.


29 posted on 10/22/2007 8:01:13 PM PDT by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
I wasn't referring to this thread, but to FR.

Last week a FReeper talked about VP Cheney and the military seizing control if we have another contested election in 2008.

Over the years I've seen FReepers sound confident that the military would disobey orders from the government to take a stand with "righteous Christians" in a second civil war.

It's insanity. And it's this eagerness from both sides that has me worried.

30 posted on 10/22/2007 8:01:19 PM PDT by Publius (A = A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: exit82

“Many here on FR allude to a looming type of civil war, that society has fractured along invisible fault lines, some dealing with reality and some dealing with rabid liberalism, some along the lines of failed Socialist policies that are trying to be resurrected, even after their utter failure has been exposed.

“In American history this fractionalization of political thought reminds me of 1860, when the fissures of the body politic became deep, undeniable and irreversible.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1882512/posts?page=24#24


31 posted on 10/22/2007 8:01:55 PM PDT by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Publius

John Titor anyone?

Not that I believe Mr. Titor (or whomever), but it seems this whole idea of a CW in America’s future is not new.


32 posted on 10/22/2007 8:10:14 PM PDT by khnyny (Although prepared for martyrdom, I preferred that it be postponed. Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: exit82

1860 is the not yet by five or ten. This coming election could be a Kansas 1855.


33 posted on 10/22/2007 8:17:43 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fishrrman

Thanks for the link.

That’s some view of the future.

And entirely plausible, too.

There is definitely a Balkanization of America going on. And it is doubly disheartening that BOTH political parties are pushing it—as if they will be immune from the consequences somehow.


34 posted on 10/22/2007 8:18:56 PM PDT by exit82 (I believe Juanita--Hillary enabled Juanita's rapist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

And 1929, possibly. And in some ways, Spain before their civil war. With some Balkanization tossed in, Aztlan style.
***Throw in Revelation Chapt13, and it’s like reading tomorrow’s newspaper.


35 posted on 10/22/2007 8:20:09 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

You were ahead of your time.

“Cold Civil War” is such an apt description.


36 posted on 10/22/2007 8:20:38 PM PDT by exit82 (I believe Juanita--Hillary enabled Juanita's rapist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Publius

I agree about the eagerness issue - it’s insane for anyone to actually WANT a civil war, considering how bloody our first one was, and that the second will likely be even worse.

As for where the military would put its loyalty, in 1936 Spain and 1973 Chile, they did turn against their respective governments. Then again, there are other cases where the military stood by a liberal regime. We won’t know until it happens, and hopefully it won’t have to come to that.


37 posted on 10/22/2007 8:22:22 PM PDT by JillValentine (Being a feminist is all about being a victim. Being an armed woman is all about not being a victim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
I've thought about a Nader-Paul alliance, too.

To make 2008=1860, though, there would need to be two strong challengers to the "major" candidates, and I don't believe Nader OR Paul fill the bill. Furthermore, the left-wing moonbats know very well that Hillary is one of them.

If the GOP nominates a socon, then I think there will be a GOP liberal-RAT conservative "unity" ticket (think Bell-Everett), and there MAY be a right-wing Nader equivalent, as well (think Breckenridge). If the GOP nominates a liberal, there will be a conservative insurgency.

My main point is that the current party system and the increasingly entrepreneurial nature of running for office cannot stand the stresses that are going to be put on it between now and November 2008.

38 posted on 10/22/2007 8:24:46 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Trails of trouble, roads of battle, paths of victory we shall walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bvw

You’ve piqued my interest.

Can you expand on that view? I’m very interested, and I admit, my memory of the pre-Civil War Kansas situation is sketchy.


39 posted on 10/22/2007 8:25:09 PM PDT by exit82 (I believe Juanita--Hillary enabled Juanita's rapist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: dufekin
" A Cold Civil War"

It's patriotic to be a traitor.

40 posted on 10/22/2007 8:29:18 PM PDT by melt (Someday, they'll wish their Jihad... Jihadn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson