Posted on 10/22/2007 11:52:29 AM PDT by abb
Before the writers and producers get back to the bargaining table Monday, I'd like to share with you my reporting about what the Hollywood moguls are thinking now that the Writers Guild Of America members have overwhelmingly (by 90.3%) authorized a strike to start anytime November 1st or later against the Alliance Of Motion Picture & Television Producers. I must say, what I learned truly shocked me.
First, this is where the individual moguls stand vis a vis a WGA strike. I'm told they break down into only two groups, not the three groups from last time around. So instead of hawks, moderates and conservatives, there's now only hawks and conservatives:
Hawks: Peter Chernin (News Corp/Fox), Bob Iger (Walt Disney/ABC), Barry Meyer (Warner Bros), Jeff Zucker (NBC Universal), Michael Lynton (Sony Pictures Entertainment).
Conservatives: Les Moonves (CBS), Ron Meyer (Universal), Brad Grey (Paramount), Amy Pascal (Sony Pictures Entertainment), Harry Sloan (MGM, which also reps United Artists in this), Jeffrey Katzenberg (DreamWorks Animation, and the most moderate of the bunch).
Nothing about this list should be terribly surprising. Sloan's struggling studio with all its financing and box office problems needs a strike like a hole in the head right now. Katzenberg wants to be the mogul who brokers a compromise, but his bigwig brethrens don't care to let him play the hero role. (More about Katzenberg below...) Zucker, with GE threatening to sell the entertainment unit, doesn't want to get mired into more onerous financial formulas that are going to make his business even worse. Lynton wants to be a moderate but, like Zucker, needs to lower his upfront costs and, like Zucker, answers to a very strong-willed parent company whose businesses are diversified and who demands the entertainment unit now posting a return on investment in the low single-digits to at least get back to high single-digits (since no one expects the old double-digits anymore).
As for Chernin, Iger, Barry Meyer, Moonves, and also Zucker, they actually welcome a strike because they believe the 2007/2008 TV season is dead on arrival anyway. So many new shows are tanking in the ratings and/or going over budget and/or having production problems (Fox's Back To You, Nashville, K-VILLE; CBS' Kid Nation, Cane and Viva Laughlin; NBC's Journeyman, Life and Bionic Woman; ABC's Cavemen, Big Shots, Dirty Sexy Money, and Pushing Daisies.) Even returning hit shows are losing their Nielsen luster (NBC's Heroes, ABC's Desperate Housewives and Grey's Anatomy, CBS' CSI:Miami and Cold Case) that they feel this is as as good a time for a strike as any. As one mogul told me, "We can get rid of the overhead and regroup and rethink everything. If we were having a great year, it might be different. But we're not, and this is like an automatic do-over." As Les Moonves last week told his personal publicist (or is it apologist?), Bill Carter of The New York Times, "I'm not concerned about the state of CBS. I'm a bit concerned about the state of network television generally."
I found this news really surprising because of the willingness of the network moguls to so readily give up eyeballs that may never return to broadcast television. Didn't any of them notice the Halo 3 phenomenon? But even more shocking because the WGA's TV writers who make up the vast majority of the guild membership have been clearly operating under an illusion. (This won't be the first time for that by either side...) As I wrote Friday night, intense pressure is coming from the TV writers to strike sooner rather than later in order to hurt the primetime business to the greatest extent possible. They argue that waiting until January 1st would allow most shows to bank 6 to 8 more episode scripts, and the only real way for the WGA to wield palpable power is to shut down the TV season as soon as possible, even by November 1st. Now I find out that this will play into the hands of the TV moguls who certainly sound ready to give up the season entirely. It's useless to point out that the last strike was in March 1988, lasted 22 weeks, and cost the industry a half-billion bucks. Because the answer I get back from the moguls is that they've now mastered the programming "art" of cheap reality TV and game shows. (See my previous, Strike Vote In For WGA: 90.3% Say "Yes")
Here's another shocker: there are no meetings planned by the moguls for the moguls. And none have been held to date. Lots of communications by telephone. But no brainstorming sessions like the ones held at Katzenberg's house when he headed Walt Disney Studios. The moguls were supposed to "stand by" for a meeting sometime in the next few days. But now that looks unlikely, I'm told.
At the same time, the moguls are convinced they're losing the PR war in the pre-strike period. Because I understand the studio and network bigwigs thought their renouncement of residual rollbacks was a "really big deal" concession that would get the writers in a positive frame of mind. I'm told the moguls were genuinely shocked at the WGA spin to members that it wasn't much of a concession since it never should have been on the table in the first place -- and there are dozens and dozens of other AMPTP-proposed rollbacks for the guild to still worry about. "Right now, the attitude is that we made a major move, and they're kicking sand in our face," a mogul told me.
So some of the moguls want to come up with a way to get their unfiltered viewpoint across to the WGA. Katzenberg is the most vocal about this, floating the idea of "putting a face out there to show we're human". Suggestions include holding a press conference, sending one or several studio and/or network bigwigs to the negotiating sessions, or starting a so-called "mogul blog" to focus on the strike. Or maybe creating a Q-&-A session with those moguls who feign sincerity better than others and posting video of their conversations on an AMPTP web page.
The moguls also have spent the past five days "devising our own alternatives" to present to the WGA. The problem, say the bigwigs, is that "no one at the WGA has come to us with a formula" and "without residuals, the WGA is having a hard time articulating what they really want." In other words, the bigwigs are looking for all the i's dotted and t's crossed specifics of, say, a New Media plan that would give writers a share of digital revenue before they can even consider it. So the moguls and their business side people and their negotiating committee are "looking at different packages, putting alternatives and options and combinations together" so something new is on the table for Monday's session or soon after. "We're trying to narrow the issues to those issues that really matter," a source told me. "As cavalier as some of the hawks and conservatives are, the goal is really to avoid a strike."
But the moguls think what else is missing is a Big Name to help solve this mess. The legendary Lew Wasserman is long gone. And uberlawyer Ken Ziffren saved the moguls' and writers' asses by ending the last WGA strike. And Bob Daly, ex-Warner Bros chairman, stepped in and stopped a WGA walkout from even starting in 2001. Who's it going to be this time around? The names I'm hearing include Daly, Ziffren or his law partner Skip Brittenham, even The Governator Arnold Schwarzenegger. Ex-Sony and ex-Paramount bigwig Jonathan Dolgen's name has also surfaced (as one source told me, "Because in my experience he's one of the smartest guys ever with numbers. And he doesn't need charts and graphs. He's just brilliant at explaining it to people.") There's also ex-Viacom and ex-Universal mogul Frank Biondi, who knows the business inside and out and can be a calming influence. You know, and I know, the decision will be made (if at all) on the basis of who will offend the least amount of people involved.
Tomorrow, I'll file on what compromises might be in store...
I think it comes down to this: professional TV critics tend to know very well how TV shows are produced, so they understand clearly the self-referential humor of the show, which was created by Tina Fey (a former cast member on NBC's Saturday Night Live). Problem is, most of the TV viewing audience have no idea how TV shows are produced, so they don't understand the premise of the show; that's why 30 Rock has such poor ratings.
30 Rock has one or two really funny moments each time, but the Tracy Lawrence character and the Kenneth character are horrid, completely unfunny...I fast forward through the show every time they come on.
I do enjoy them making fun of the TV biz, though, it’s some really good satire.
Ed
There’s something about “The Unit” that just pisses me off. Maybe it’s that sergeant ordering the President, SecDef, and various generals around, maybe it’s their soap opera private lives, but something bugs me.
I liked Battlestar for a while, but it got boring and they never accomplished jack.
“Place the same cast anywhere west of the Alleghenies or south of
the Potomac and they will be considered Neanderthals, mentally disturbed,
or retarded.”
You forgot the worst tag...
religious
I forgot the Office, it is funny. The boss character makes me want to reach in the TV and slap him.
I’d miss “NCIS” and “The Unit” but the writers on strike would go hungry long before would I.
At the center of debate is how much compensation (if any) writers will get for works sold over the internet (as in, 100 percent of Hollywood’s product in a decade). The studios are proposing to give them little to nothing as residuals, and the writers will bring the industry down with them before they accept that.
There will always be a demand for skilled writers. Studio heads in a world where direct P2P distrubution reigns surpreme? The phrase “buggy whip” comes to mind. Moguls can throw a lot of weight around, but it’s their heads on the chopping block, and it’s time they learned it.
I’m sure it’s fun to poke at the writers here, but bear this in mind: only 90 percent of the writers hate us, but 100 percent of the studio chiefs do. For the sake of the 10 percent trying to improve matters, consider rethinking your position.
Try SkyAngel.com Christian programming -- I've had it since 2001 and it is unabashedly conservative.
Nope, I’m pretty sure Nikki is a dude. I’ve seen him on TV otherwise I would go back to thinking it was a chicks’ name.
Re Mythbusters. Too many times, their thesis question is the
WRONG question.
Case in point: One the same show w/ the Bull in China Shop demo
they asked the question “Will bullets dropped into a fire kill a person?”
They concluded that a bullet in this manner would not. However, they
concluded that the shrapnel produced in the explosions could
put out an eye or inlfict a serious gash or puncture wound. One
need only know that nitrates exposed to an open flame in an
encapsulated systam will impart some degree of velocity on either
the warhead or the shredded casing. Ever see what a stone thrown by
the rear tire of an 18-wheeler can do to a car windshield? Now imagine
a piece of shredded ammunition casing hitting you in the face. Then
they threw the enclosed beer keg ont hefire. A closed system. The
heat elevated the pressure wi/ the canister and BOOOOOOOOOOM!
This is something anyone having taken hi school chem should know.
Even the two on Mythbusters. Shredded canister plus the tap component which was a welded addition was sent skying. Did the aerosol can as well.
Being a practiciing scientist, asking the correct thesis question is critical.
OTOH, would you have children throwing bullets onto an open fire
based on the premise that MB concluded that it would not cause death?
All it takes is ONE freakish situation.
PBreak has been done before—see R Kimball and The Fugitve. As I recall,
it lasted 3 full yrs and that was back in the day when Hollyweird was
cranking out about 15+ eps per season for about 30/yr. The current
twist on PBreak harkens back to Crime Story ala Ray Luca in Latin Am.
By doing only 6-8 eps/season, Hollyweird can extend the run.
MTM, Newhart and Arthur Carlson were in rare form last night.
MV
TVLand takes great shows and beats them into the ground. A better
format would be to corral a sufficient number of shows and reproduce
typical TV nights of the week from past decades. As an example,
take a Monday night from the 70s:
MASH
Lucy Show
WKRP
etc
Or have a Spin-off night:
All in the Family
Maude
The Jeffersons
Archie Bunker’s Place
Rather than repeating the same shows over and over and over again.
Monday nights from 9-11 are reserved for AmLife!
MV
I completely agree. The whole point of that channel should be to celebrate the art of television.
Why not a week’s worth of Playhouse 90?
Anybody up for a Get Smart marathon?
Think Flipper and Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea might make Saturday afternoon fun again?
If 10pm is for court dramas, shouldn’t The Defender, Perry Mason and Checkmate make appearance?
If 2 1/2 Men is interesting, how about Bachelor Father?
Why not rotate Man from UNCLE and Wild, Wild West?
I got a million of them and I really would love to see them all.
But, no, we’ve got to watch Megavegamin for the umpteenth time. Not good.
LOL, we've watched the first two episodes and I realized that I only like the musical productions. The plot is same old, same old.
Well, Bourbon Street Beat was on AmlIfe but it was only shown
for 1yr in PrimeTime back in the day. I saw the episode of the
killer ape!
How abouts a Greatest Generation night?
Twelve O’Clock High
Combat
Rat Patrol
(Occasionally show Gallent Men and Jericho)
(I think Am LIfe shows several of these shows one nigh each week).
Sneak in Tour of Duty every now and again.
How about shows that were good but only ran 1-2yrs?
That’s My Momma
Hot L Baltimore
On the Rocks
Perfect Strangers (first 3 seasons only)
Angie
Bossom Buddies (Tom Hanks)
No, that’s Vitameatvegamin!
MV
Thanks, MV...interesting post!
Ed
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.