Posted on 10/21/2007 11:38:01 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache
The only reason I want them to go is so we can get on with the business of supporting one candidate like the Dem’s are with Hillary. It’s cluttered. We have to be realistic...Hunter, Tancredo, and Paul are not polling well at all and are not getting the funds to survive.
It is a total shame because I really like Hunter and Tancredo...but their future should be in a cabinet position in the next Republican White House.
It’s my take that they gave him few questions because he hasn’t gained support. But how can you gain support if you’re not asked questions?
There will be a push to eliminate the lower tier candidates. It had already started before this debate. It’s my take that they thought they were doing Hunter a favor by even letting him appear. Reducing the questions seemed reasonable to them.
I disagree, but then that’s my opinion.
I think we might hear of that on Hannity and Colmes tonight. Luntz really had this look on his face when I called her a socialist and then later a communist. Which forced him to ask the room who here thinks Hillary is a socialist.
The crew behind him looked like a deer in headlights.
Whether we can stand it or not Republicans will do everything in their power to elect anyone else but Clinton.
In 2000, it was anyone-but-Gore and we got Bush2.
In 2004, it was anyone-but-Kerry and we got Bush2 the Globalist with a middle finger to the conservatives [Dubai ports, Miers, amnesty round 1 (2006), amnesty round 2 (2007), amnesty round 3 (2007) and still trying to get it attached to other legislation].
The RNC is hoping for a rousing anyone-but-Clinton in 2008. But 2006 told them the GOP was in serious trouble with its policies. The GOP/RNC still maintain those same policies. Their anyone-but-Clinton may not work this time — because they are still pushing such policies as open borders and amnesty for illegals. They lost the conservatives. They seem to be heading for a brokered convention. Who emerges (a globalist more of the same or a real conservative) will determine whether they can garder enough support to stop the Hillary machine.
33 posted on 10/22/2007 4:47:21 AM PDT by TomGuy
You would have rather had Gore or Kerry???
We better stop deluding ourselves.
I don't like her, you don't like her,
but there are more people who would vote for her than for Giuliani.
At least right now.
The more people learn about Giuliani, the gap will widen.
In the Witch's favor, that is.
A lot of people are going to be in for a RUDE awakening.
“Then you are not ‘staying home’.”
As I’ve written several times herein, no, I’m not staying home. I’ll be voting for every office on the ballot, and except in the case of a baby-killing nominee running for president with an “R” attached to his back, I’ll vote straight Republican.
“...If you also don’t think we should throw all the Rudy supporters out of the party and tell all the Ron Paul supporters to go away,...”
As long as they vote for the eventual nominee, Mr. Thompson, I don’t think they should be thrown out. Frankly, it is THEY (especially the rudybots) who have indicated they’d like to throw US out of the party.
“...then you are the least of my worries.”
Well, then, if folks like me are the least of your worries, then you’re not overly worried about another Clinton presidency.
There are plenty of social conservatives who will vote in 2008, but will under no circumstances vote for Mr. Giuliani, if he is unfortunately the Republican nominee.
sitetest
Just wanted to clarify in case the Luntz group has members trolling here today. I already got a few messages from people sent to me today who work for some of the candidates.
They are trolling here.
The problem as I see it is that most Americans are not learned in their understanding of politics. They take in the nightly news (and unfortunately it is STILL the MSM), so they get slanted views. Period. Which means name recognition. Until we draft a well-known, HIGH NAME conservative, most won’t vote for him. Bush needed to name a high-name conservative who was WILLING to run in 2008, but he chose Cheney instead. I love Dick Cheney - he has done a great job; but that decision is why we have all this going on. No one was being groomed to take Bush’s job. This is a critical moment in WORLD HISTORY - IT IS NOT THE TIME to elect another CLINTON that helped get us to this crisis in the FIRST place by awful policies against terrorists and failure to get Bin Laden when Clinton had numerous opportunities. Hillary will be more of the same koolaid, only worse because she’s never RUN anything except her mouth!
Thank you Suzy. Hunter is a well grounded individual. Your comments aren’t out of line, but I think you forget that a President has a great many people at his disposal to help organize his staff and run the show.
He would have top level advisors. He wouldn’t lack for executive assistance I can assure you.
What matters to me is what is at the core of the individual. Hunter would not be a pushover and his moral compas would rule.
I appreciate your thoughts on this.
You were able to reduce this to two words, “Sore loser”.
Here, read it again. I think you may have missed something.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1914434/posts?page=178#178
+ 1. I totally agree with you.
He may be. I’m not that tuned into his comments that are out there. I just know he’s bad enough that I can’t support him.
I appreciate the observation.
Overall from the group, was there anybody that said they would vote third party, or not vote at all if Rudy was the nominee? And did anybody change their mind about that after the debate?
Did you find most of the participants more socially conservative? Or was there a general mix of conservatives?
You said that? Wow! Good for you! Sometimes I wonder about Luntz.
I appreciate the post. Evidently between two and three years ago he made some incredibly obnoxious comments about illegal aliens to the effect that calls for cracking down weren’t good.
The list of opinions you posted were actually quite good.
The other day someone posted some of his past comments and it was a real eye opener for me. I don’t know if he’s had his Romney moment or what, but this doesn’t strike me as consistant on the subject.
I do think it’s good that you brought this up, and I’ll try to do some nosing around to see what I can find.
Thank you.
No third party. People were kind of worried that Ron Paul is going to pull a Perot and cost us another election. I said not to worry that the only reason Ron Paul is up there still is because of anti-war donating libertarians. He will be shut out soon enough.
The consenus at the start of the night was more people would like to have a true Reagan/Nixon like Conservative but sadly there were a good number of people at the end of the night who said they were willing to accept the nominee and vote against Hillary and not so much for the nominee if it were Rudy.
You think I should be worried that you will vote for Hillary? Why should I worry about you? You will vote for conservatives whereever they run. You won’t antagonize moderates and liberals who call themselves republicans so they are chased out of our party. You will work hard for the conservatives we run.
You are a worry, because you won’t vote for the republican nominee for President, and we might end up with hillary, but you are the LEAST of my worries, because others will do MORE things that are worrisome than you are.
I realise I used the term “least” in it’s literal sense in a place where most interpret the phrase colloquially. I apologize for that.
The mods will zot ‘em soon.
I have to disagree completely with Luntz’s assertion Republicans are disorganized or whatever. If nothing else, I took away from that focus group and that debate that Republicans ARE fairly united. That actually surprised me. But, conservatives are strong individuals who aren’t afraid to chart their own course, so compared to the socialist sheep we may look disorganized but that is very misleading.
Romney I thought was disappointing. More than once he failed to answer the question, and instead took the opportunity to spew his spiel, same with Guiliani.
I thought Thompson came off very well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.