“Then you are not ‘staying home’.”
As I’ve written several times herein, no, I’m not staying home. I’ll be voting for every office on the ballot, and except in the case of a baby-killing nominee running for president with an “R” attached to his back, I’ll vote straight Republican.
“...If you also don’t think we should throw all the Rudy supporters out of the party and tell all the Ron Paul supporters to go away,...”
As long as they vote for the eventual nominee, Mr. Thompson, I don’t think they should be thrown out. Frankly, it is THEY (especially the rudybots) who have indicated they’d like to throw US out of the party.
“...then you are the least of my worries.”
Well, then, if folks like me are the least of your worries, then you’re not overly worried about another Clinton presidency.
There are plenty of social conservatives who will vote in 2008, but will under no circumstances vote for Mr. Giuliani, if he is unfortunately the Republican nominee.
sitetest
You think I should be worried that you will vote for Hillary? Why should I worry about you? You will vote for conservatives whereever they run. You won’t antagonize moderates and liberals who call themselves republicans so they are chased out of our party. You will work hard for the conservatives we run.
You are a worry, because you won’t vote for the republican nominee for President, and we might end up with hillary, but you are the LEAST of my worries, because others will do MORE things that are worrisome than you are.
I realise I used the term “least” in it’s literal sense in a place where most interpret the phrase colloquially. I apologize for that.