Posted on 10/21/2007 2:32:12 PM PDT by DennisR
I would argue that Seattle is the most-friendly city for pets. After all, there are more dogs (about 150,000) than children in Seattle. And if the liberals (who have destroyed a once-family-friendly city) have their way, dogs will soon be in complete control of the place. See http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/pacificnw05142006/2002974751_pacificpdogs14.html and http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-03-13-babybust_x.htm (which claims that Seattle has 45% more dogs than children). Ah...the idiocy and insanity of liberalism is on full display in a once-great city.
A little chihauhau in a bag tried to bite me yesterday. An old man was carrying him and I pet him. He didn’t like it. THe dog, not the man.
What difference does it make if they grow up to be productive or not? THe point is they grow up and there’s lots of them. And they don’t often become conservatives. THerefore, the libs will never die out.
Hmmm. You might be right. Look at what happened to the Shakers, who did not believe in sex.
I know he meant DC, but...
Its my favorite episode is why I remember it so well.
I love the old shows, most were on before I was born. I attend a local Memphis Film Festival every year. It is mostly about shows like you mentioned.
Wow, thanks for posting that!
“Do not accept your dogs admiration as conclusive evidence that you are wonderful.”...... Ann Landers
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.