[cpforlife.org]

I was going to take time to reply to you but honestly I don’t think you are worth it. Your reply makes you come across like a pompous condescending windbag and I’m not going to bother.

Get lost.

[burzum]

I was going to take time to reply to you but honestly I don’t think you are worth it. Your reply makes you come across like a pompous condescending windbag and I’m not going to bother.

And your post makes you come off like somebody who is embarrassed that he or she didn't understand the implications of the word used. You probably haven't read the Constitution for years and forgot that it had parts explicitly listing qualification and disqualification from office. Luckily I provided a link in my last post. Read it and educate yourself. After that, head over to the FindLaw site and read how the Constitution is actually interpreted.

[Shimmer]

I thought his post made sense.

[noname07718]

You just made a simple mistake. You should have used a word or term like “ill-suited” instead of “disqualified”. Unsuited is a subjective evaluation of a person, whereas disqualified is an objective reading of the Constitutional definition.

Words have meaning; we should use them intelligently and wisely.