[burzum]

Read the Constitution. It is not a long document. Highlight every time you see qualification, disqualification, and qualify(ies).

I'll give you a hint: the US Constitution is not like the constitutions of communist countries where a candidate is disqualified for political beliefs or religious views. You may not like it, but you cannot give a religious test to qualify a candidate which is what every 'disqualification' you listed above entails.

Don't use the word 'disqualification.' It obviously means something you do not understand as written in the Constitution. If you don't like Guiliani then don't vote for him. Don't say it is because of his religious or political 'qualifications.'

[Petronski]

The word “disqualification” can be used in many senses. Your posts are tedious and (for you) embarrassing.

[cpforlife.org]

I was going to take time to reply to you but honestly I don’t think you are worth it. Your reply makes you come across like a pompous condescending windbag and I’m not going to bother.

Get lost.

[Eaker]

If you don't like Guiliani then don't vote for him. Don't say it is because of his religious or political 'qualifications.'

Who the hell put you in charge of the speech of others?

Here, I'll save you some time n00bie, NOBODY did.

[TigersEye]

If you don't like Guiliani then don't vote for him. Don't say it is because of his religious or political 'qualifications.'

Those are my reasons. Why shouldn't I say it?