Posted on 10/20/2007 8:59:39 PM PDT by april15Bendovr
Seems to be a common theme in what the Democrats, Ron Paul and this lunatic are saying if you take out the Holocaust remarks from Ahmadinejad.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: I wanted to Visit Ground Zero to Prevent 9/11 from Becoming Another "False Idol" Like the Holocaust
(Excerpt) Read more at liveleak.com ...
Failure in Iraq? Dude, Saddam is gone and they have a democratic government now. Their economy is quasi-free market and growing by leaps and bounds. They have their own police force and army now. How much longer do you want them sucking at the U.S. teat? It'll be the year 3000 and you'll still be posting on FR arguing about the need to "stay the course."
“and his rallies have more people than the other candidates combined”
Many are inspired by their drug addictions
Not really, I support the surge and disagree with Paul on an immediate withdrawal. I just know that he's right in the sense that we don't need to stay there for decades building permanent bases at a cost of billions per year and trying to bring democracy to a bunch of middle age heathens. It's unfortunate that he won't compromise, but given the stark choice between coming home and staying in that rat hole for another generation, I'd rather they come home.
Another smear. So for years FR used to whine about the so-called "sheeple" who never participated in politics, but when these folks see someone they like and support, they're suddenly a bunch of kooks and hippies.
One good thing about the Paul threads is that they have really exposed some of you guys as total hypocrites.
For how long though? There's always going to be terrorists in the Middle East regardless of how long we stay there. How about securing our borders and kicking out suspicious Muslims here, and putting future terrorist states on notice that if they attack us again they'll be sand particles?
Should we just stay there for decades and our military can be the equivalent of a giant bug zapper?
And if the Ron Paul Cult haven't read any info about Iraq on FreeRepublic such as PreWarDocs and CitizensReportonIraq that would make them???
Protecting our borders and being proactive by killing Al Qaeda is a good thing.
We don't need another 9/11 so instead of being reactive all the time like our pinko liberal Democrat useful idiots proactive should be in our best interest.
I will continue tomorrow after I get some sleep.
No more MC HAMMER Gif’s
I grew up debating at a large Irish Catholic family dinner table and I never run from a discussion. Most people wish I would.
“Are you blaming America for our problems in Iraq in post #30”
I am saying Americans are being lied to, decieved, mislead, misinformed.
Wake up!
“It’s not a matter of what is true that counts but a matter of what is perceived to be true.”
—Henry Kissinger
“To die for an idea: it is unquestionably noble.
But how much nobler it would be
if men died for ideas that were true.”
— H. L. Mencken
The Black Budget Report: An Investigation into the CIAs Black Budget and the Second Manhattan Project
http://www.american.edu/salla/Articles/BB-CIA.htm
National Security Act of 1947 (UNCLASSIFIED)
http://www.intelligence.gov/0-natsecact_1947.shtml
Population Control NSSM - 200 Exposed!
http://www.hli.org/nssm_200_exposed.html
NSSM 200
NATIONAL SECURITY STUDY MEMORANDUM 200
Blueprint For World De-Population And Western Domination
http://www.lifesite.net/waronfamily/nssm200/index.html
‘In 1946 the judges at Nuremberg who tried the Nazi leaders for war crimes left no doubt about what they regarded as the gravest crimes against humanity. The most serious was unprovoked invasion of a sovereign state that offered no threat to one’s homeland. Then there was the murder of civilians, for which responsibility rested with the ‘highest authority.’
- John Pilger
To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.
-—Nuremburg War Tribunal regarding wars of aggression
“It is the absolute responsibility of everybody in uniform to disobey an order that is either illegal or immoral.”
— General Peter Pace, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
National Press Club, February 17, 2006.The conversion of Saul of Tarsus while he was on his way to Damascus
“They will be held accountable for the decisions they make. So they should in fact not obey the illegal and immoral orders to use weapons
of mass destruction.”
— General Peter Pace, CNN With Wolf Blitzer, April 6, 2003
Worth repeating. They love to spew their CNN/Washington Post/NYT/CodePink/MoveOn defeatist garbage.
Stuff like this makes them writhe in agony. :-D
There certainly seems to be an agenda there. Ron Paul votes more with the Democrats than he does with the Republicans. Ron Paul is the surrender pit-bull, allowing Hillary & Co. the luxury of appearing to support the war in order to appeal to more moderate Democrats and the independents who support it.
This may blow up in their faces, though. Ron Paul will likely appeal more to the liberals and fringies and may pull votes from Hillary or Obama if he goes back on his word and runs third party.
He gets a lot of attention at Huffingtonpost.com Airamerica.com and Antiwar.com. Gorgonunleashed.com has a video “MoveOn.org Umbrella Group Running Pro Ron Paul Advertisement.”
Give me specifics, not fantasies.
Paul says the way to abolish the IRS is to cut government spending by 40%.
How will Paul get those spending cuts through a Democrat congress? Hell, how would he get them through a Republican congress? Again, give me the specifics, and I don't mean that lame bill Paul introduces each term proposing to repeal the 16th Amendment.
How could Paul's "plan" be accomplished immediately? If no immediately, how would it be phased in? Again, give me the specifics.
When will people realize most of the "Big L" Libertarians have no plans. They are the political equivalent of Yasser Arafat. They derive power by complaining, not doing. Once you actually have a plan, you might actually have to implement it, and then, heaven forbid, you might actually be held accountable. The reason Paul has no official tax plan the same reason Arafat did not sign the peace deal with Ehud Barak. Because if Arafat signed the treaty then Arafat would actually be held accountable. If Paul had a tax plan, he would actually be held accountable. Because Paul does, like Arafat did, derive power from complaining rather than leading.
This is the real reason the LP hates the Fair Tax. They see it as a threat to their power base. Getting freedom back to people is not the goal of the LP. Getting freedom back to people is single biggest threat to the reason for the existence of the LP.
Paul is all talk. Big Hat, No Cattle. Like the LP, he fears leadership, and draws power by complaining. He complains about what is wrong, but offers no concrete plans to fix it. It is an interesting testimony in the same metro area Paul calls home, a group of people put their money and effort to research a new tax system. They have done more, in money and effort, than the Libertarian Party has done in its 36 years of existence. They have drawn more people at a single Fair Tax rally than the Libertarian Party has drawn at all of its presidential nominating conventions combined.
I stand by my comment. Huckabee is the only candidate who has endorsed a specific tax plan. Thompson is a close second, suggesting either the latest Flat Tax proposal or the Fair Tax should be considered. Every other candidate, including Paul, has not offered any specific alternative tax plan.
PAKISTAN’S INTER-SERVICES INTELLIGENCE (ISI)
by B. Raman
(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai. E-Mail: corde@vsnl.com )
http://www.saag.org/papers3/paper287.html
Libertarian party is made up with a large percentage of potheads. Their symptoms include a lethargic type hedonism. They brag about great ideas but can never find the time or energy to deliver their agenda.
I am honestly starting to think lately that their passive aggressive view on Iraq has something to do with protecting their own drug habits.
“Are you blaming America for our problems in Iraq in post #30”
“Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories
concerning the attacks of September the 11th;
malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away
from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty.”
-—George W. Bush
(1946- ) 43rd US President, Yale Skull & Bones Society
operation northwoods - Google Search
u.s.s.liberty attack - Google Search
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&q=u.s.s.liberty+attack&btnG=Search
gulf of tonkin set up - Google Search
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&q=gulf+of+tonkin+set+up&btnG=Search
pearl harbor set up - Google Search
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&q=pearl+harbor+set+up&btnG=Search
Family Affair: the Bushes and the Bin Ladens
http://www.thedubyareport.com/bushbin.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.