Posted on 10/20/2007 2:08:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
"I speak for at least half the people here, including the Founder Jim Robinson, who has stated he will not vote for Giuliani under any circumstance."
Agree.
Don't Cut and Run, vote pro-life every time. It's the way you always win.
‘We cannot diminish the value of one category of human life — the unborn — without diminishing the value of all human life.’ —Ronald Reagan
Hello Rudy proclaimed Ginsburg as a model of what type of justices he'd choose. Give me a break.
I'm not sure how many states have this rule.
In New York, Rudy is almost certain to get the Republican nomination. Therefore it makes sense to hold off and see if your support for a third-party candidate is needed. In states where you don't lose that right, or where the race is close, it makes sense to vote for a pro-lifer in the primary.
We start signature-collecting season October 30, so it is coming right up. I don't think anyone has the time to do a survey of all 50 election laws, so my humble advice is to be aware of the voting laws in your own state, check out the probability of the winner, and make an intelligent decision with forethought.
Many will probably disagree on this, but the Central Committees no longer have the power to choose candidates as they used to have. Elections are now candidate centered. Central Committees are there to help (or should be), but it's up to the candidates organization today.
Given his past track record of nominating overwhelmingly Liberal candidates, why would we believe he would nominate anything else?
Also, he has a disturbing behavior patter of lying about inconvenient facts in his past.
Why would I believe anything he has to say???
This is a pledge.
I will not vote for a pro-abortion candidate.
I will vote only for a pro-life candidate. I will carefully scrutinize any candidate I think is a phony pro-life candidate simply mouthing the right words for the sake of political expediency. If their past words make them suspect, they must demonstrate in some substantial way that they have actually changed.
How many conservatives were available when pro-life presidents nominated Souter, Stevens, O’Connor and Kennedy. I would imagine quite a few. If a pro-life president would nominate supporters of Roe then what makes you think a pro-abortion president would nominate a judge that would vote against it?
I hope so.
Lets see how Hillary protects the unborn.
You dont betray the ones that “brung ya to the dance” and get away with it. If its Guliani vs. the Beast..Im for Guliani.
Dittos from the Reinheimers!
You're preaching to the choir on this one. Tom McClintoch was my boy!
Well, your strategy worked with Mel Martinez.
CA? You will work for the referendum, right?
Permitting democrats to take elected offices will not protect any of the unborn. It can only serve to make things worse.
—
How so?
What then? How can we take that chance?
No reason to vote for him anyway. Unless the Republicans swing FAR to the right, we will wind up losing even more seats in both houses...
No Constructionist judges are going to be approved by a Democrat controlled Senate anyway. The judges are a lost cause.
The only way we get judges is with a conservative candidate popular enough to have coattails in order to begin regaining the Houses of Congress.
I’m getting out my Christmas card list and sending stuff out to all my friends who care about the election — just don’t do their research. Heck, I don’t care. I’ll do it for them and spend the postage to let them know what I think. Have done it for every national election for a long time. It counts.
She'd probably do a better job than Rudy. With Republicans galvanized against her, none of her pro-abortion bills are going to pass.
You dont betray the ones that “brung ya to the dance” and get away with it. If its Guliani vs. the Beast..Im for Guliani.
You don't urinate on your base of supporters but then expect them to support you in the general election. The conservatives who man the phones and go door-to-door, passing out flyers? They're the base, hello! With Rudy nominated, that simply ain't going to happen. Conservatives will be indifferent, if they aren't supporting whatever 3rd party candidate will instantaneously arise once Rudy's nominated.
More typical is that the pregnancy is not convenient, and in such cases, we cannot innocently withhold judgment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.