Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wheee The People

This is not a state-wide smoking ban. It is a state-wide smoking ban for public indoor places such as resturants, bars and a few other venues.


42 posted on 10/20/2007 3:25:41 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Old Chinese Proverb (well sorta) say dance with the one who brung ya. Yes we very much like Crinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
It is a state-wide smoking ban for public indoor places such as resturants, bars and a few other venues.

It is not even that. It is a statewide ban for indoor PRIVATE property. Indoor public places are government controlled buildings, not privately owned buildings.

72 posted on 10/20/2007 6:16:05 PM PDT by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
It is a state-wide smoking ban for public privately owned indoor places such as resturants, bars and a few other venues.

A little less ambiguous there, if the state wants to regulate it, the state should make some "public" restaurants to regulate on the line of "public" restrooms, town squares, parks etc...

Of course, give the states track record of quality in pretty much any endeavour, I'm willing to bet vast sums of money that a state restaurant that prohibits smoking will echo with the sounds of crickets when competing with a private restaurant that allows it and to top off the irony, the morons wanting to ban the smoking will still be in the private restaurants...

123 posted on 10/21/2007 10:12:49 PM PDT by Axenolith (Subduction leads to Orogeny...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson