Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

The problem is once you give the inch, and allow a ban in a business.

Then it’s on to apartments.
Then own house, and if you have kids they take them away for child endangerment.

Then another wack-o group comes along, and does the same thing about meat/religion/guns.


253 posted on 11/18/2007 9:14:54 PM PST by the7erm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: the7erm

I do think there’s some truth to that arguement. It’s important that the public at large let the government know that they aren’t going to sit still for that kind of crap. I don’t support the no-smoking effort going any further than it has, and I’ll join any of you opposing attempts to add more classifications to the no smoking efforts.


258 posted on 11/18/2007 10:51:56 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson