What if people just stayed out of everyone else's business?
Posted on 10/20/2007 1:52:53 PM PDT by Wheee The People
Poll: Two-thirds of Wyoming voters support statewide smoking ban
CHEYENNE, Wyo. - A statewide poll shows that two-thirds of Wyoming voters support a ban on smoking in public places, including restaurants and bars.
The poll, commissioned by the American Cancer Society in Wyoming and other health organizations, also found that 74 percent of registered voters believe the right of customers and employees to breathe clean air outweighs smokers' right to light up indoors.
"It shows that the people of Wyoming would absolutely support a smoke-free Wyoming," said Loretta Wolf, spokeswoman for the American Cancer Society in Wyoming. The American Cancer Society and the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, a national group that supports smoke-free legislation, also helped pay for the poll.
Harstad Strategic Research Inc. of Boulder, Colo. conducted the poll between Sept. 26 and Oct 1. They contacted 504 registered voters across the state. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percent.
A poll commissioned last year by the Casper Star-Tribune found 57 percent of Wyoming voters supported a comprehensive, indoor smoking ban. That poll, conducted by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research, Inc., surveyed 625 Wyoming voters and had a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.
The new American Cancer Society poll found that 92 percent of voters say they would go to restaurants more frequently or at least as frequently as they currently do if smoking were prohibited in them.
Only 6 percent of voters said they would go to restaurants less frequently if indoor smoking were outlawed, while 8 percent said they would be less likely to frequent bars.
While 66 percent of voters supported a statewide smoking ban, the American Cancer Society poll found 32 percent opposed it. Democrats and Republicans supported the ban at about the same level, 67 percent and 68 percent, respectively.
Support for the ban also remained constant among people of different ages, with support only varying a few percentage points between voters aged 18 to those 60 or older.
The poll found that 70 percent of women supported a smoking ban compared to 61 percent of men.
More than 70 percent responded that they believe exposure to secondhand cigarette smoke is harmful to people's health. Twenty-seven percent of voters surveyed said that exposure to secondhand smoke is "just somewhat" or "not at all" harmful.
The poll results were released while a legislative committee is considering whether to introduce smoke-free legislation at the upcoming budget session in February.
Wolf, of the American Cancer Society, said her group is pushing for a comprehensive bill that includes a ban on smoking in bars, restaurants or other businesses. About 27 states have adopted smoke-free laws but the restrictions vary.
Sen. Charles Scott, R-Casper, chairman of the Labor, Health and Social Services Committee, has said he only intends to introduce the bill in next year's budget session if a majority of the committee members supports it.
Rep. Dan Zwonitzer, R-Cheyenne, sponsored a similar bill in the last session, but it failed to make it to the House floor for a first-reading vote. Lawmakers anticipate a tough fight in the coming session if the bill moves forward.
Dan Hatanelas, manager of a bar in Cheyenne, opposed a citywide smoking ordinance that became law last year. He said he would also oppose statewide legislation.
However, Hatanelas said that a statewide ban might be more fair to businesses in Cheyenne that now must compete against nearby Laramie County businesses that are exempt from the local ban. He said his bar saw a 19-percent drop in revenue during the first 12 months of the local ban, which took effect in August 2006.
"I'd hate to see anything happen, but maybe on a statewide basis it would be less traumatic for us," Hatanelas said.
In addition to Cheyenne, the cities of Laramie and Evanston have adopted their own smoke-free ordinances. The Rock Springs City Council is considering a similar ordinance. Voters in Casper rejected a proposed ban in 2000.
Information from: Star-Tribune, http://www.casperstartribune.net
“”What I am convinced of is that I couldn’t really enjoy the evening out having to endure someone else’s smoke...””
***********
So you are in agreement to strip away a business persons ‘private business’ right to run their operation as they wish?
Cigarettes, Pipes and Cigars are legal; if a business person wants to cater to those individuals who partake in tobacco, why are you giving the government the power to restrict their trade? Will you subsidize them, through taxes, for business lost?
If a business has a ‘Smoking Permitted’ sign on the door - don’t go in - you have no right to be catered to in any establishment.
I don’t like screaming kids - I don’t go to Chuck E Cheese - and I don’t have a right to pass legislation to ban kids from Chuck E Cheese because I am disgusted by the atmosphere there...and it could be a cause of elevated blood pressure which could cause a heart attack...
Gabz - Thanks for the Ping
I have never heard anyone else make that comment but it is the same for me. If I breathe tobacco smoke while I am eating, the food immediately loses all its flavor. It is like I have cardboard in my mouth. I have gotten up and left many a restaurant and my uneaten food because of this.
that's "voters," not "citizens."
wyoming is another sleepy, mind-your-own-business sort of place that's been hijacked by the left.
Wake up, Wyoming.
It’s legal and it grows in all fifty states. You are allowed to grow up to a tenth of an acre. It can only be for your own personal use -you cannot sell what you grow. Once the first crop becomes acclimated to your soil and environment and seeds are obtained from that crop, the next planted seeds do very well.
I see not too many people here agree with you, lol.
That’s a GOOD thing.
I saw how they conduct these polls in Minnesota a few years back. They put the “I don’t give a rats rear end” people down as for the ban.
Land of the Slaved, Home of the Sissy.
The stigma, yes, but the other factor is the everincreasing cost of cigarettes.
When the survey includes the question, “Should the SALE of tobacco be illegal?”, that answer will mean something. These surveys sound like they start with, “what color pony do you want for Christmas?”
Doesn’t tobacco have to be processed in some way before it can be smoked?
Tennessee recently enacted a statewide ban along with a much higher cigarette tax. Folks are flocking out of state to buy their ciggies, not only for the savings, but also to make a statement. The state of Tennessee, at last count, had lost 14 mil in revenue since this happened. I know to some of you folks in the richer states, that doesn’t sound like much but it is a tidy sum in Tennessee.
Very good point!
Wow! That many?
Oh hell yes I support these laws for restaurants and bars. And your mentioning Chuckey Cheese is a great example of why. If these laws weren’t in effect those establishments would smell like a forest fire during business hours.
Smokers are one of the most inconsiderate groups of people on planet earth. Rather than exercise some self-control, they make laws like this necessary.
As for your snide subsidy remark, the whole state of California has been made a non-smoking area in businesses for over a decade. Guess what, we still have restaurants and bars. Those owners are still turning profits. And smokers do show up at them. Strangely, after the laws were passed, they found the courage to go without a smoke for the time they were in these establishments. Amazing huh.
When political correctness has infected even the Western states, we might well and truly be doomed.
What if people just stayed out of everyone else's business?
Looking better every day.
Once we liberate that country, we should liberate this one.
Hysterical!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.