Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Osama's handling officer was incharge of Benazir's security
http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/oct/19raman.htm ^

Posted on 10/19/2007 8:07:21 PM PDT by Arjun

Osama's handling officer was incharge of Benazir's security

B Raman

According to latest reports, at least 132 persons -- 20 of them police officers deputed to protect former Pakistan prime minister Benazir Bhutto [Images] -- were killed in a suspected suicide attack on the convoy by which she was being taken from the Karachi airport to the mausoleum of Mohammad Ali Jinnah on the night of October 18. The suicide attack or attacks were clearly aimed to kill her on arrival in Karachi to a triumphant welcome by her supporters, but she managed to escape.

Reliable sources say one or two suicide bombers were involved. The bullet-proof vehicle by which she was being taken by her supporters was protected by two cordons of security guards. The inner cordon consisted of security guards engaged by her Pakistan People's Party parliamentarians to protect her. Many of them were former policemen and ex-servicemen enjoying her and her party's confidence. The outer cordon consisted of officers of the Sindh police and plainclothes security officers of Pakistan's Intelligence Bureau, which is now headed by Brig Ejaz Shah, a former officer of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence, who is a close personal friend of Gen Pervez Musharraf [Images] and Gen (retd) Mohammad Aziz, a Kashmiri officer belonging to the Sudan tribe who orchestrated the overthrow of Nawaz Sharif as prime minister in October 1999.

Shah is also a close personal friend of many Punjabi leaders of the Pakistan Muslim League (Qaid e Azam), which is opposed to Benazir's return.

According to these sources, the suicide bomber or bombers managed to penetrate the security cordon of the police and IB officers without being frisked, but could not penetrate the inner cordon of security guards of the PPP. When stopped, they blew themselves up at a distance from her vehicle. At the time of the explosion, she had gone inside the vehicle to rest for a while. This seems to have contributed to her miraculous escape. Had she been standing on top she might have been injured, if not killed.

There are many elements in Pakistan, and in Karachi itself, which are opposed to her and are determined to prevent her return to power. These include the various jihadi terrorist groups, Al Qaeda [Images] and its allies, those involved in the kidnapping and murder of Daniel Pearl and the supporters of Dawood Ibrahim [Images], the Indian mafia leader who has been given shelter in Karachi by the Pakistani intelligence agencies. The anger against her is due to various reasons -- the fact that she is a woman, her close proximity to the US and her open statements supporting the US on various issues. They see her as the US cat's paw. It is difficult to say at present who might have been responsible for the attack on her.

Brig Ejaz Shah has been strongly criticised by Benazir and her supporters for the security failure and they have demanded his removal and arrest. When he was in the ISI, he used to be the handling officer of Osama bin Laden and Mulla Omar, the amir of the Taliban. After Musharraf seized power in October 1999, he had Shah posted as the home secretary of Punjab. It was to him that Omar Sheikh, who orchestrated the kidnapping and murder of American journalist Daniel Pearl, surrendered because Omar Sheikh knew him before and was confident that Ejaz Shah would see that he was not tortured.

After Pearl's murder, there were many allegations regarding Shah's role. Musharraf tried to protect him by sending him as the ambassador to Australia or Indonesia. Both the countries reportedly refused to accept him. Musharraf then made him the DG of IB and he saw to it that the death sentence against Omar Sheikh for his role in the Pearl case was not executed. The courts have been repeatedly postponing hearings on the appeal filed by Omar Sheikh against the death sentence.

Ejaz Shah played an active role in the campaign to discredit Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Caudhury of the Pakistan Supreme Court after he started calling for the files of a large number of missing persons who were taken into custody by the police and the intelligence agencies. Reliable sources in Pakistan reported that Gen Pervez Kiani, who was the DG of ISI at the time of the suspension of the Chief Justice, was against the suspension but Musharraf suspended him on the advice of Ejaz Shah and Maj Gen Nadim Taj, who was at that time head of the Directorate-General of Military Intelligence. Maj Gen Taj has since been promoted as Lt Gen and has succeeded Kiyani as the DG of ISI.

While the ISI under Kiyani refused to file any affidavit against the suspended Chief Justice before the court, the IB and the DGMI filed affidavits giving details of all the information which their organisations had indicating the alleged unsuitability of the Chief Justice to head the Supreme Court.

Despite the political embarrassment caused by the case, which ended in a fiasco, Ejaz Shah continues to enjoy Musharraf's total confidence.

(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai. E-mail: seventyone2@gmail.com)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: india; pakistan; paksitan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 10/19/2007 8:07:29 PM PDT by Arjun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander; patriot1939; Ernest_at_the_Beach

Pakistan ping


FReepmail me if you want on or off the Pakistan ping list


2 posted on 10/19/2007 8:11:15 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (Star Wars teaches us a foreboding lesson--evil emperors start out as Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arjun
The constant interplay of shifting forces and players in Pakistan is fascinating to watch.
3 posted on 10/19/2007 8:22:30 PM PDT by bill1952 ("all that we do is done with an eye towards something else." - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arjun
When he was in the ISI, he used to be the handling officer of Osama bin Laden and Mulla Omar, the amir of the Taliban.

Musharraf was stupid for keeping this obvious Al Qaeda sympathizer around instead of just shooting him.

4 posted on 10/19/2007 8:23:35 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arjun
How do you know who to support? The ISI is undoubtedly corrupt. Bhutto and Musharrif are implacable enemies - yet both seem to be supporters of Democracy and the United States. Al Qaeda wants to kill them both. Half the population sees bin Laden as hero and solution to their problems.

A portion of Pakistan, Wazeristan, is probably harboring bin Laden and his lieutenants.

There is a bunch of sorting out to do in Pakistan - there is steam coming out of the pot....won't be long before the pressure builds and pops the top off the kettle!!

5 posted on 10/19/2007 8:26:55 PM PDT by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out of Qurans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard
There is a bunch of sorting out to do in Pakistan

I vote we use a few W-88s dialed up to about 250 kilotons followed up by our remaining Rockeye nerve gas bombs. If anything is left twitching 60 or 90 days of B-52 strikes would finalize the sorting out process.

L

6 posted on 10/19/2007 8:32:51 PM PDT by Lurker ( Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing smallpox to ebola.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arjun

The bit-players who sympathize with Al Qaeda are way, way out of their league. Bhutto is not only clever, but she’s also a “slit your throat while you sleep” kind of gal.

Lots of Al Qaeda blood will be spilt in Pakistan soon...some of which might even make the news...and they won’t be able to lay a glove on her in return.


7 posted on 10/19/2007 8:34:03 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G8 Diplomat

Now it is getting very interesting.....


8 posted on 10/19/2007 8:50:13 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam; SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle

News bump!


9 posted on 10/19/2007 8:53:20 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Related article:

Three million received Bhutto on return in 1986

10 posted on 10/19/2007 8:58:37 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Arjun
Benazir Bhutto Blames Rogue Officials For Bomb
11 posted on 10/19/2007 9:06:46 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard

There is a bunch of sorting out to do in Pakistan

I've been thinking the same. The situation gets more complex every day it seems. Bhutto and Musharraf, while political enemies, both support the US. A former ISI guy was established as a secretary by Musharraf, but al-Qaida wasn't to kill Mushy and Benazir and have tried several times. And half of Pakistan's population apparently needs mental therapy if they think OBL is a hero.

Politics in Pakistan is a royal mess. And it doesn't help that it is discussed in Urdu or Punjabi or some obscure language half the American populace probably hasn't even heard of.

12 posted on 10/19/2007 9:08:09 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (Star Wars teaches us a foreboding lesson--evil emperors start out as Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

I’ve never had a clear understanding of how deadly nerve gas bombs are. I know it can cause instant death, but can one Rockeye really kill as many people as a W-88? Had this horrendous fear when we took Baghdad that Saddam had rigged the whole city with nerve gas, ready to be unleashed as soon as our soldiers arrived en masse, or to take out the Iraqi people to deprive them of a future without him. If he had a Rockeye, how many people could he have taken out as a percentage of the city’s population?


13 posted on 10/19/2007 9:09:05 PM PDT by DrGunsforHands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Arjun

I’m so glad we have cemented ties with India.

They seem to be a buffer of sanity next to that insane. Islamic Extremist cesspool known as Pakistan.

At least India is pluralistic, democratic, free, secular, English-speaking, has a Common Law based legal system, is scientifically and technologically progressive, religiously moderate and diverse, and above all, pro-West.

Plus it doesn’t hurt that both the United States and India were children of the same parent - England - and therefore can totally relate to one another as siblings with more in common than differences.


14 posted on 10/19/2007 9:37:31 PM PDT by DEUS PITAR (O Come O Come Emmanuel, and Ransom Captive Israel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G8 Diplomat

wasn’t = wants

Apparently, when I type after midnight I switch my consonants...


15 posted on 10/19/2007 10:11:03 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (Star Wars teaches us a foreboding lesson--evil emperors start out as Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...

It just seems like that might not work right. Maybe it’s just me. Thanks E.


16 posted on 10/19/2007 10:18:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Tuesday, October 16, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard

“The ISI is undoubtedly corrupt. Bhutto and Musharrif are implacable enemies - yet both seem to be supporters of Democracy and the United States. “
Actually Musharraf doesnt want democracy. He wants what any dictator wants which is to have power. He will play lip service to democracy in order to satisfy the US and the public. The military has always controlled pakistan and they have the chinese backing.
Mushrraf & ISI will not let Benazir stay alive since she will always be a voice of democracy. With Benazir gone, there will be noone to challenge the military.


17 posted on 10/19/2007 11:13:12 PM PDT by Arjun (Skepticism is good. It keeps you alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DEUS PITAR

I think the US has made a mistake in supporting Musharraf. US would have had better results in the WOT if there was democracy in Pak.


18 posted on 10/19/2007 11:33:22 PM PDT by Arjun (Skepticism is good. It keeps you alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Arjun

Benazir Bhutto may be the best ally we can hope for in Pakistan.


19 posted on 10/20/2007 1:05:43 AM PDT by Solitar ("My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them." -- Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Arjun
Can’t believe all that damage was caused by “Manpack” bombs. At least one vehicle born device would seem likely.
20 posted on 10/20/2007 7:04:42 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson