Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Cav Crews See Higher-Tech Attacks, Weapons from Iran
American Forces Press Service ^ | Fred W. Baker III

Posted on 10/19/2007 5:34:18 PM PDT by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Oct. 19, 2007 – Air cavalry helicopter pilots have had to change their tactics to adapt to newer and higher-tech surface-to-air missile systems that officials believe are coming in from Iran, a senior official in Iraq said today.

Crews from 1st Air Cavalry Brigade out of Camp Taji, Iraq, have flown support for operations in and around Baghdad for more than a year. Since their arrival, there has been an increase in the sophistication of attacks and types of weapons, Army Col. Daniel J. Shanahan said in a conference call with military analysts.

“In the last several months, we have had an increased threat from systems that we had not seen in the first part of the year,” Shanahan said. Some of them originated in “places like Iran,” he said, causing considerable change in tactics, techniques and procedures.

“It’s a real concern, and it’s something that we’re dealing with,” he said. “Right now we’ve got the best systems in the world, and we’ve got technology behind us.”

Shanahan said additional sensors and diffusers, which decrease an aircraft’s infrared signature, have been added, and crews’ flying tactics have changed.

Shanahan’s crews have logged 80,000 hours of flight time in the past 13 months, he said. The helicopters spend about 10 hours in the air for every one on the ground, Shanahan estimated. But even though the enemy’s weapons systems are more advanced than before, overall attacks on aircraft are down in the area, he said.

Crews are fired upon about 200 times monthly, he said. Attacks are from weapons types ranging from small arms to rockets known in military parlance as “man-portable air-defense systems,” or MANPADs, which are shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles that typically use infrared guidance.

MANPADs make up only about 5 percent of the attacks, “but if you ask the pilots, they would say that MANPADS is the biggest threat,” Shanahan said.

It takes about 3,000 troops to fly, fuel, arm and maintain the H-64 Apache, UH-60 Black Hawk and CH-47 Chinook helicopters operating around the clock at the base. The aircraft are used for attack reconnaissance, air assault, air transport and medical evacuation missions.

In addition, crews partner with Iraqi air force units for training and some missions. The Iraqi air force has progressed sufficiently that it routinely provides reconnaissance missions, patrolling pipelines, power lines and other infrastructure. It also provides in-country transportation for Iraqi government officials.

Iraqi air force pilots fly three types of helicopters: Mi-17s and Bell JetRangers in training programs and UH-1 Hueys mounted with defensive systems, which are workhorses for reconnaissance and transport, Shanahan said. This frees his crews from these types of missions and is a critical step toward the Iraqi government assuming its own security mission, he said.

Related Articles:
1st Air Cav Shifts Tactics, Enables Iraqis to Complete Mission


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aircav; attacks; crews; frwn; highertech; iran; iraq; weapons

1 posted on 10/19/2007 5:34:54 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketFR WAR NEWS! Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

WAR News at Home and Abroad You'll Hear Nowhere Else!

All the News the MSM refuses to use!

Or if they do report it, without the anti-War Agenda Spin!


Not for commercial use. For educational and discussion purposes only.
2 posted on 10/19/2007 5:39:16 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

> The helicopters spend about 10 hours in the air for
> every one on the ground, ...

That’s astonishing. Historically it was 10 maint hours
for every flight hour for helos.


3 posted on 10/19/2007 6:43:32 PM PDT by Boundless (Legacy Media is hazardous to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Good MORNING (:)~ I....
YA HO....ran.....
Coming to get you ~ran.....!!
Receive your REWARD, you bunch of
raghead cowards.....
the clock ticks on.....but not for long....
YA HO! Comin' to get ya!
4 posted on 10/19/2007 6:54:30 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (God Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform, Our Heroes. And Vote For Mr. Duncan Hunter, America! TLWNW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless
Historically it was 10 maint hours for every flight hour for helos.

I believe the CH-37 Mojave required 30 hours of maintenance for each flying hour. Since it was a heavy lift bird, the Army didn't have many in the inventory. Amazing how far we've come.

5 posted on 10/19/2007 8:19:44 PM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

6 posted on 10/19/2007 9:39:41 PM PDT by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. General Creighton Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks
Amazing how far we've come.

That's because most systems developed about the time the Apache and Blackhawk were, to include F-15, F-16, F/A-18 as well as Abrams and Bradley, had strict Reliability and Maintainability requirements and programs in place. Their subsystems also had strict specs as to what environments they must operate in. Temperature, Humidity, vibration, pressure (or lack thereof) and were tested during development to see if they met those requirements.

Today, while the requirements are sometimes still there, the testing requirements are often waived in the interest of getting the program to production, in the face of limited or even cut, budgets.

7 posted on 10/19/2007 10:38:33 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

That 10:1 statement is false.

More than likely, the reporter got it wrong.


8 posted on 10/20/2007 6:26:36 AM PDT by ChiefKujo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson