Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hocndoc

I wish you were right.

But I know for a fact that you’re not.


30 posted on 10/20/2007 7:12:03 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (With "Republicans" like this, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

I can be optimistic about your believability, too. It’s just that I’m dealing with an unknown person or persons posting under a pseudonym vs an organization made up of people with whom I’ve met and worked.

Personally, I wish all but the top 3 or 4 would drop out, allowing us to focus our energies on those. Dr. Keyes should have shown up as a regular attendee, like the rest of us (only with his own security). He could have/would have had a welcoming audience. And he could have joined Phyllis Schlaffly and Laura Ingraham. I was impressed with their absolutely unapologetic speeches - as well as the fact that they were given a forum to say that they are not in the mood to put up with pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-family, antigun “Republican” candidates. They gave us an opportunity to applaud the “right” lines.

I can’t fathom the motive for purposefully skewing this poll one way or another, except to bury the Guiliani votes. (that’s why I clapped every time someone could have been suggesting that we wouldn’t vote for a prochoice candidate - it’s time to scare them, now.)


31 posted on 10/20/2007 7:49:47 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson