I can be optimistic about your believability, too. It’s just that I’m dealing with an unknown person or persons posting under a pseudonym vs an organization made up of people with whom I’ve met and worked.
Personally, I wish all but the top 3 or 4 would drop out, allowing us to focus our energies on those. Dr. Keyes should have shown up as a regular attendee, like the rest of us (only with his own security). He could have/would have had a welcoming audience. And he could have joined Phyllis Schlaffly and Laura Ingraham. I was impressed with their absolutely unapologetic speeches - as well as the fact that they were given a forum to say that they are not in the mood to put up with pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-family, antigun “Republican” candidates. They gave us an opportunity to applaud the “right” lines.
I can’t fathom the motive for purposefully skewing this poll one way or another, except to bury the Guiliani votes. (that’s why I clapped every time someone could have been suggesting that we wouldn’t vote for a prochoice candidate - it’s time to scare them, now.)
He’s a presidential candidate, one with decades of hard-earned stripes laboring in the tough part of the fields.
To ask him to just come hang out, without a speaking role, is insulting in the extreme. Especially when you’ve already given your platform and your political capital to leftwingers like Giuliani and Romney.
You’ve got FReepmail.
That idea constitutes a terrible disservice to the American people.
Not a single sovereign citizen has cast a vote, and will not for months.
We're not the Soviet Union, where a small clique of Politburo members decide who can be considered candidates, thereby pre-determining the outcome.
Or, maybe we now are...