Randall Terry to Discuss Efforts to Derail Giuliani at Press Conference

Christian Newswire ^ | 10/18/07 | Christian Newswire

[wagglebee]

"So-called 'pro-life Republicans' that are endorsing Rudy - like TX Governor Rick Perry, or NY Representative Pete Sessions, are typical treacherous politicians. They have betrayed innocent blood to support a child-killer; we can only wonder what 30 pieces of silver' they are seeking." Randall Terry

"Pro-life Republicans are on trial, to see what we value more: life or power; principle or party." Randall Terry

Contact:  Mr. Randal Terry, Operation Rescue XX, 904 687 9806

MEDIA ADVISORY, Oct. 18 /Christian Newswire/ -- Randall Terry, Founder of Operation Rescue, will hold a press conference in Boston, Mass. to discuss efforts to derail a Giuliani Nomination, and a Giuliani Presidency, should Giuliani get the nomination.

When: Friday, October 19, at 11:00 A.M.

Where: Republican Headquarters, 85 Merrimac St., Boston.

What: The duty of pro-life Republicans to defeat Giuliani at all costs.

Mr. Terry is on a ten week, 20 state tour of college campuses, churches, and pro-life groups, recruiting pro-life Republicans to fight against a Giuliani Presidency - even if it means the election of Hillary Clinton.

For radio interviews, here are some of the points Mr. Terry can discuss:

1. Concerning child-killing itself, Giuliani would appoint judges who will uphold Roe vs. Wade; he has stated he would allow federal funds (taxpayer dollars) to be used to pay for the death of unborn children; he opposed the ban on partial birth abortion; he would make pro-abortion appointments in positions of great power; all of this would result in setting the pro- life movement back 20 years, and severely undermining our goal of restoring the protection of law to unborn babies.
2. As President Giuliani would be the de-facto head of the GOP; he would systematically destroy the political power of the pro-life movement within the GOP; he would pressure the party to take the pro-life plank out of the party platform; he would declare the "abortion issue" is divisive, and should not be part of federal races; he would make the GOP the mirror image of the DNC regarding child-killing, thus insuring that there is no pro-life party.
3. An enemy outside your camp makes you vigilant; an enemy in your tent makes you dead. Hillary would unite us, and she could be defeated in 4 years; Giuliani would destroy the cohesion of the right wing.
4. Could we vote for a man who right on every single issue, except that he was a racist? Or was a candidate who supported slavery? (Of course, he would never own his own slave, but he would defend any other white persons right to own his own Negro.) How then can we in good conscience vote for a man who supports the destruction of innocent human life, which is far worse than slavery or racism?
5. In 1991, then President George Bush justly destroyed the Louisiana Gubernatorial Candidacy of David Duke, because Duke was a racist. Which is a worse crime against God and man? Racism, or murder?
6. As horrifying as it seems at first blush, Hillary Clinton would probably be a better president for the Pro- Life movement (and the innocent children we seek to protect) than Rudy Giuliani. The GOP needs to fix its moral compass, before we become the second party supporting the death of the innocent.

[floriduh voter]

Brownback says Rudy won't get nod.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/19/420221.aspx

[Sun]

“Brownback says Rudy won’t get nod.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/10/19/420221.aspx “

I don’t think so, either, and will check out your link.

Thanks!

[Guenevere]

You first met him 3 years ago...

I knew of him in 1988 and I've met him too...

I stand by my comment...

[floriduh voter]

I met Randall Terry FOUR years ago. I didn't know him from Adam at the time and well, Terri was rescued back then. As a matter of fact, tonight's the four year anniversary of Terri Schiavo going to the hospital for life saving treatment. Randall Terry didn't do it alone but he drew the media to Pinellas Park and that certainly got the ball rolling.

It's so corrupt here that no one could save Terri in 2005. No one.

[Guenevere]

You're talking to the choir as far as Terri Schiavo is concerned, God bless her.

I was in tears over their treatment of her...

..but believe me, it was her family and her priest who called attention to her plight....

..Randall came in when all the cameras were there.....and yes, he does generate attention.

I'm sorry, but that's the way I feel

[floriduh voter]

Randall was invited. Now, let’s make up.

[Melas]

I’m curious about the views of Melas, Johnnie and the other Rooty Rooters

I've made it clear that I am not trying to persuade anyone on FR to vote for Rudy, especially in the primaries, so please cease with calling me a Rudy Rooter, it is at best, inaccurate.

What I am saying that is that I'm going to vote for the Republican nominee, regardless of who in the present field it may be. If you need to label it, call me a Republican Booster. I'll wear that particular badge with honor.

[Melas]

I might consider your indecent proposal if you promised, for the remainder of the primary campaign, to continually go on record that no one should vote for Rudy, even in the general election. (You would only change your tune after the primary.)

You're asking me to lie until after the primary, and I cannot and will not do that E-Mat. I'm going to vote for the GOP nominee, and that's a fact. If I were to state otherwise, I'd be lying through my teeth.

[Melas]

For, you see, promoting confidence in Rudy for the general election promotes confidence and votes for him in the primary among all would-be supporters.

Upon further reflection, why the Rudycentrism around this train of thought?

Why not say that I'm promoting confidence and votes for Duncan Hunter in the primary, since I'm going to vote for him if he's the nominee?

Why not say that I'm promoting confidence and votes for Fred Thompson in the primary, since I'm going to vote for him if he's the nominee?

Why not say that I'm promoting confidence and votes for Mitt Romney in the primary, since I'm going to vote for him if he's the nominee?

Why not say that I'm promoting confidence and votes for Tom Tancredo in the primary, since I'm going to vote for him if he's the nominee?

Why not....

[Melas]

You've gotten to that point, have you? Well, so have I. I do think people who are pushing for Ruday have lost their minds

I'm getting tired of repeating this, but I'm not pushing for Rudy. I may or may not vote for him in the primary, but it's of little consquence to me if he wins or loses. What is certain, is that I'm going to vote for the GOP nominee, period.

[Melas]

Would you vote for Hillery if she ran as a Republican?.

No, and I have every confidence that the GOP would not and could not vette Hillary through the primary process. Your very question is the epitome of hyperbole since she could not win a Republican primary. I have more faith in my fellow Republicans than to ever allow it.

[seemoAR]

Your answer means nothing. I asked if you would vote for Hillery if she ran as a Republican.

[Melas]

Your answer means nothing. I asked if you would vote for Hillery if she ran as a Republican.

I answered you. I quote from my post to you this time with emphasis on the one word first clause, "No, and I have every confidence that the GOP would not and could not vette Hillary through the primary process."

[seemoAR]

Sorry about that. I misread you. Now you must feel exactly like I do when someone suggests that I vote for Froot Loop just because he calls himself a Republican. To me, there isn’t any difference between the two except he is better looking in a dress.