Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tired of Taxes

Again, no private organization, no matter their agenda, should get Free Land from the Tax Payer.

Not the Boy Scouts
Not the Girl Scouts


53 posted on 10/18/2007 10:00:32 AM PDT by trumandogz (Hunter Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: trumandogz

So churches that qualify as tax exempt should be paying “fair market value” as well? The BSA provides a valuable service to the community, you could call it a barter system but you seem to be quite contrarian in your opinion of that.

SZ


66 posted on 10/18/2007 10:04:31 AM PDT by SZonian (Tagline under repair until further notice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: trumandogz

How do you think most of the western US was settled? Free land.


74 posted on 10/18/2007 10:06:47 AM PDT by Jigajog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: trumandogz

Good should the Scouts leave they should blow up the building!


79 posted on 10/18/2007 10:08:39 AM PDT by restornu (No one is perfect but you can always strive to do the right thing! PRESS FOWARD MITT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: trumandogz

“Again, no private organization, no matter their agenda, should get Free Land from the Tax Payer.

Not the Boy Scouts
Not the Girl Scouts”

Nor the U.S. Military.

Fidel is closely watching so he can push us out of Gitmo. He only gets $10 a year.


91 posted on 10/18/2007 10:12:37 AM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: trumandogz
The article calls it a "city-owned building," but it may be wrong. No one answered my question, so I researched it:

Click here for source.

SNIP

According to property law, should the Boy Scouts ultimately be evicted, ownership of the land would revert back to the city of Philadelphia. But the Boy Scouts built the headquarters with its own funds, and the organization spends about $60,000 annually to maintain it, says Cradle of Liberty Council spokesperson Jeff Jubelirer. In 1994 the organization spent $2.6 million to refurbish the structure.

“I don’t know what the city’s legal rights are regarding the building itself and the land—that’s likely one of the issues that could be dealt with in a legal proceeding,” Jubelirer says.

/SNIP

They should tear down the building, if they can do so legally.

And there's a lesson here: Don't build private property on public land.

119 posted on 10/18/2007 10:24:32 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes (Dad, I will always think of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson