To: trumandogz
The current rent in One Dollar per year!
I am not sure the Scouts need to be 200k a year but One Dollar is ridiculous. The Scouts do not need to be receiving Welfare from the city. Raise the rent.
__________________________________________________________
Did you miss the fact, that although the city owns the land, the scouts built the building in 1928, in return for the $1 year rent?
25 posted on
10/18/2007 9:53:36 AM PDT by
chaosagent
(Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
To: chaosagent
No, i did not miss the point.
But why should the scouts get free land from the city?
44 posted on
10/18/2007 9:57:44 AM PDT by
trumandogz
(Hunter Thompson 2008)
To: chaosagent
"Did you miss the fact, that although the city owns the land, the scouts built the building in 1928, in return for the $1 year rent?"
If that's true, and if there's a written contract formalizing that arrangement, then the city might be in breach of contract. But if it was a city ordinance or resolution, it can probably be unilaterally amended or revoked by the city.
133 posted on
10/18/2007 10:30:38 AM PDT by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: chaosagent
EXCELLENT POINT.
Perhaps the city should just sell the land to the scouts for $1 a year.
Probably the same deviants who want to turn Episcopal churches into Bathhouses and Condos are the ones who want to take this landmark (it is eligible for national landmark status thus precluding alteration or demolitions) and turn it into a stain.
263 posted on
10/18/2007 11:31:41 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson