Posted on 10/18/2007 8:36:01 AM PDT by Spiff
How about a United States of Earth? If a country adopts the constitution of the USA and lives up to it for 50 years, then they can apply for statehood.
Why mess with alliances that can only weaken you and take your money?
The UN is like old ex-friends you haven’t heard from for twenty years and then you hit the lottery and they want to let you in on the greatest investment scheme ever!
US out of the UN, UN out of US!
I like Fred too, BUT.
Several people who watched the debate all agreed that is looks sick and drawn out from the cancer.
And I too like what Mitt just stated.
I saw Fred on Neal Cavuto’s show a few days ago, and he looked and sounded great. He had good answers for all the questions, and, I have to say, I like his thoughtful style - he actually thinks before he speaks, which is refreshing - and his answers are directly to the point.
I would call this the ultimate pander, but with Romney, there’s always tomorrow...
‘Republican White House hopeful Mitt Romney called the United Nations a failure on Thursday...’
I’d say its pretty much the same with the UN on any day of the week.
Wow.... some one making sense.... just.... wow!
Works for me, too, but I would want this goal in writing, as part of the platform put to the public.
He might look good on a coin after all.
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ron's weekly message [5 minutes audio, every Monday] • Podcast • Weekly archive • Toll-free 888-322-1414 • |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Free Republic Ron Paul Ping List: Join/Leave |
An anti-U.N. ping. Perhaps Mitt is beginning to articulate a positive and pro-sovereignty message.
The more the merrier. Dr. Paul has never claimed a patent on abolishing the U.N. He welcomes everyone to join him in calling for defunding this criminally corrupt and incompetetent group of international meddlers and bunglers and for expelling it from our soil.
Oh ROmney, you just jumped ALMOST to the head of the line with those comments about the UN.
It is and has been, to some extent, for months. Look at Romney's Strategy for a Stronger America which is his platform. In that document, you will find the following:
The failure of efforts such as the United Nations Human Rights Council has given multilateralism a bad name. Americas strength is amplified when it is combined with the strength of other nations.We need to expand alliances such as NATO and efforts among the worlds leading nations to face the new threat of radical Jihad and increase our homeland security.We need to build global and regional capacities and networks of law enforcement and intelligence officials to confront Jihadists and other transnational threats.And later in his platform...
In the changing world we face, our alliances and engagement must change, too. Clearly, the United Nations has not been able to fulfill its founding purpose of providing collective security against aggression and genocide. Thus, we need to continue to push for reform of the organization. Yet where institutions are fundamentally incapable of meeting a new generation of challenges, the United States does not have to go it alone. Instead, we must examine where existing alliances can be strengthened and reinvigorated and where new alliances need to be forged.
What he's saying is that the U.N. has demonstrated that it is a failure. If it can't be reformed and remains incapable of meeting today's threats of jihadism, etc., then we will not go our own way but forge new alliances to replace the U.N.
Nice. I’m not a Romney fan, but this moves him up a few notches in my book.
If he means it, I could get on board.
Another good one from yesterday:
Governor Romney: In the face of the global radical Jihadist threat, many in the Democratic party are in the most serious, delusional and politically-driven denial since Neville Chamberlain.
---> Not afraid to tell it like it is. What a relief.
I don't think that Romney is calling for abolishing the U.N., but for possibly withdrawing from it to form a new aliance. Of course, the U.N. would self destruct without our support. Which would be a good thing.
I don't see anything here to get excited about other than the hypocrisy of FReepers who call Paul a kook for advocating withdrawal from the UN since the 70s but when a flip-flopper from Mass. suddenly has another deathbed conversion he's praised as the 2nd coming.
I think the members of the council are appointed on a rotating basis (without regard to massive human rights abuses on the part of the nations appointed), and that the US is technically still on the list.
But it is an odd thing for Mitt to hit on at this time.
This is the kind of thing Thompson should have started with on his belated entry to the race. Light up the scoreboard!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.