You know Schumer wants this so bad he can almost taste it.
1 posted on
10/17/2007 3:51:56 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
“You know Schumer wants this so bad”
NRA, too. I have received many pieces of mail “explaining” the bill. The NRA website has lots of explanations why they’re on board with Schumer.
2 posted on
10/17/2007 3:59:37 PM PDT by
DBrow
To: neverdem
Odd that the article does not say what the holdup is, or what the objections are.
3 posted on
10/17/2007 4:00:46 PM PDT by
DBrow
To: neverdem
Feel sorry for the families, but they (and, unfortunately, my NRA) are DEAD WRONG in pushing ANYTHING little chuckie schumer is for.
Like 9/11, the ONE thing that would likely have prevented the tragedy, is law-abiding citizens (and/or pilots in the case of 9/11) on the scene with concealed carry.
5 posted on
10/17/2007 4:06:01 PM PDT by
DocH
(RINO-rudy for BRONX Dog Catcher 2008!!!)
To: neverdem
The NRA helped author the GCA 1968. They’re always there to ‘compromise’. Sort of like a true RINO.
6 posted on
10/17/2007 4:10:51 PM PDT by
Old 300
To: neverdem
Yes, having Chuckie in favor of something makes it immediately suspect in my mind, but on the other hand, what would have been wrong with having the VT gunman's mental records in the system? Yes, he probably would have found a way to get a weapon anyway, but I was under the impression that most of my Second Amendment friends don't have a problem keeping weapons out of the hands of criminals and the insane.
If there's a flaw in this bill, perhaps someone will point it out, but on the surface of what I've read, I don't have a problem with it at this point...
8 posted on
10/17/2007 4:25:38 PM PDT by
hunter112
(Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
To: neverdem
could have prevented the April killings of 32 people on the Virginia Tech campus Quick. Close the barn door. The horse got away.
9 posted on
10/17/2007 4:30:56 PM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(Take the wheel, Fred.)
To: neverdem
The only problem is that pretty much any medical doctor or counselor could declare pretty much anyone to be a “mental defective” and there is no real legal recourse.
15 posted on
10/17/2007 4:57:03 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: neverdem
Yep. The only gun law that would have prevented the VA tech massacre is a concealed carry for qualified students and faculty. Mental health evaluations give the left a perfect tool to use on law-abiding gun-owners.
18 posted on
10/17/2007 5:14:35 PM PDT by
Mogollon
To: neverdem
“A gun-control bill that advocates say could have prevented the April killings of 32 people on the Virginia Tech campus has hit a roadblock in the Senate.”
The ONLY thing that would have prevented that mass killing?
Another gun.
21 posted on
10/17/2007 5:26:10 PM PDT by
Grunthor
(http://franz.org/quiz.htm)
To: neverdem
I doubt that Coburn is blocking this. Last I heard the bill was caught in a turf battle between Leahy and Kennedy. Schumer is probably trying to blame his failure to push it thru on Coburn because he doesn’t want to admit its the Dems fault. it makes no sense that one minority Senator could block this from coming to the floor.
To: neverdem
What would have prevented the massacre would have been the right to carry.
The maniacs always attack places where guns are outlawed.
54 posted on
10/17/2007 11:46:35 PM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson