Posted on 10/15/2007 10:19:26 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
It's pretty clear that Mitt Romney made a big mistake over the weekend when he told voters that he speaks for "the Republican wing of the Republican Party." Romney handed rivals Rudy Giuliani and John McCain the opportunity to remind GOP primary voters about the Old Romney, who was pro-abortion rights and courted gay voters when he ran unsuccessfully for the U.S. Senate, then successfully for governor of Massachusetts. That's the Romney, who while debating Sen. Ted Kennedy in 1994, proclaimed: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush."
Of course the Romney sound bite backfired -- it borrowed a page from the failed strategy of Howard "Democratic wing of the Democratic Party" Dean.
Team Romney does not concede that it erred. The full Romney quote shows that Romney was not impugning other GOP hopefuls or claiming that he was the only real Republican.
Romney spokeswoman Sarah Pompei said of Romney's shift against abortion rights and gay rights, "He saw the light." The Reagan-Bush quote? "Our campaign is focused on the future," she responded.
What will the future of the Republican Party hold? There is a schism between Romney and the other frontrunners -- Giuliani, McCain and Fred Thompson. Romney is the only one to sign the Americans for Tax Reform pledge not to raise taxes, a longtime staple of GOP platforms.
"Gov. Romney is committed to keeping taxes low and cutting government spending," Pompei explained.
Giuliani spokesman Jarrod Agen said that the former New York mayor "doesn't sign pledges. You just have to look at his record. His record in New York is cutting taxes."
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
I don't dislike the guy, but there's just not a lot of THERE there.
The guy’s nothing more than a moral Bill Clinton. Anyone who loses to Fat Teddy in the 1994 historic election year that swept Republicans into Congress shouldn’t be qualified for any other office.
I’ll tell you what’s really hillarious... Romney’s political hero, Slick Willie Weld, did all he could to keep his fellow RINO from hogging the limelight and did practically zilch to help his Senate bid that year (even as Weld won reelection in a jawdropping landslide), ditto with other Republicans running in that state. Ultimately, Romney delivered the final death blow to the state GOP begun by his hero in 1990.
I don’t understand the squabble either, but I know who the beneficiary will be... ...need I say the name?
The man standing largely above the fray, and the only true conservative in the race - Fred Thompson.
I agree. Well said.
I understand it is hard to admit to being wrong, but posting pictures of Fred and Jeri in the same post with a stripper upside down on a pole is a bit much.
So maybe they were not Conservatives to begin with?
Someones lying through thier teeth and it ain't conservative Fred Thompson either.
Which is like a slim Rosie O'Donnell.
Buyer’s remorse?? Nah. GO MITT!!!
YEAH! Go back to Masssachuuussettts!
YEAH! Go back to Masssachuuussettts!
I don’t see it happening. He’s pouring cash into a few “strategic” locations but if he somehow wins the nomination (doubtful) he’s never going to topple Hillary.
Yeah, but Mitt bites away from Rudy’s potential homeground (ie a few northeastern states). If there’s an upside to anything, that’s it. Let the two liberal republicans eat away at each other.
I don’t see any way for Mitt to win conclusively in the south, and he would need that to get the nomination.
I hadn't thought of that. Very good point.
I don’t really know the guy that well but every time I hear him speak, I think he out-weasels McCain. I think Romney’s strategy has been to fool conservatives into thinking he is a conservative and that he can beat Hillary before someone who is and can actually made an appearance. To get conservatives locked into supporting him before the even have a chance to get to know him since loyalty is a huge part of who we are.
But the main thing that has always bothered me about Romney is he’s a Republican that somehow managed to get elected governor of Massachusetts. That just never computed.
I mean, I think Massachusetts and other than spelling anxiety, I think Kennedy, Kerry, and Dukakis and Romney always strikes me as Dukakis-lite. Really he makes Rudy look very conservative by comparison.
How is Fred Thompson benefitting by dropping campaign stops (on an already meager schedule) and refusing to tell anyone what he actually envisions for the country? The man has no platform.
And that platform that he does have is a joke.
The man won’t back the marriage amendment, won’t vow to not raise taxes, doesn’t believe abortion should be criminalized, doesn’t think the border fence is necessary, voted against increasing fines on employers who hire illegals, voted against creating a system for employers to verify the legality of potential-hires.
Why is the man running again???
Reading comprehension [or listening comprehension] is not something you have any skill at.
Your statements are mischaracterizations of his positions and some are outright lies [”The man has no platform.”]
This was posted last week and you might want to consider the advice for yourself:
“You and Spiff and some of the others need to start concentrating on promoting your own candidate rather than attempting to tear down FRed. FRed is a fine conservative. Probably one of the best federalists we’ve ever had running for president. And I do like Duncan Hunter too. Would be great to see his campaign get off the starting blocks.
113 posted on 10/10/2007 5:07:55 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!) “
And this one:
“... Fred Thompson is a pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, pro-defense, pro-America, pro-constitution small government federalist conservative and despite having voted the wrong way on one of the counts against Clinton, he will make a damned fine president.
107 posted on 10/10/2007 4:24:52 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!) “
Thanks for posting it. It was good for a laugh. Especially funny is how many Romney bashers think there was some actual content in the article and are commenting like it does any damage at all to Romney. Those are the people who can't read beyond a headline or a bumper sticker yet feel the need to comment anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.