Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: StatenIsland

This country is still suffering the repercussions of the Clinton presidency, from the changes in healthcare to the from-the-bench legislation in the appellate courts to the exponential proliferation of once taboo sex practices among teens. What Hellary will bring to the table, if given the chance, will make all of that seem like “the good old days”, as her husband ruled by poll numbers, but she has socialist agendas that she will pursue vociferously. The fallout will likely never be overcome.

As for “defending our principles”, that is exactly the kind of thinking that got us Bill Clinton (voting for Ross Perot?), and Nancy Pelosi. It has not done one iota of good for the Republican party, and allowing the Hildebeast into the White House likewise will not do any good for the GOP or the USA.

The power that we have as a voting bloc is to vote “our” people in, and then bombard them with phone calls and emails when issues we care about are at stake. We’ve done it many times before, and when the congresscritters know that their constituents are watching and expecting certain things, they usually will comply. The answer is vigilance, not handing Satan the reins so we can feel morally superior. Its a tremendous price to pay just to be able to say “I told you so!”.


75 posted on 10/15/2007 7:54:44 AM PDT by VRWCer ("The Bible is the Rock on which this Republic rests." - President Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VRWCer
It (voting our principles) has not done one iota of good for the Republican party

So, your point is that the Republican Party has no principles???

Maybe conservatives do.

85 posted on 10/15/2007 8:49:54 AM PDT by xzins (If you will just agree to murder your children, we can win the presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: VRWCer
This country is still suffering the repercussions of the Clinton presidency, from the changes in healthcare to the from-the-bench legislation in the appellate courts to the exponential proliferation of once taboo sex practices among teens. What Hellary will bring to the table, if given the chance, will make all of that seem like “the good old days”, as her husband ruled by poll numbers, but she has socialist agendas that she will pursue vociferously. The fallout will likely never be overcome.

Hillary will "change the course of the country" as much as FDR did. The changes she promulgates will not be welcome.

Rudy - no matter how some conservatives portray him - WILL NOT DO THAT.

Of the two, whom is more preferable? The one who will "transform America", or the other who will not?

- John

209 posted on 10/16/2007 6:10:09 AM PDT by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson