 |
 |
Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
Either one wins, we all lose!
|
|
How, in heaven's name, can that be a "dilemma".
Which candidate will work to destroy the existence of the pro-life movement? And which one will not?
Which candidate has promised to appoint justices like Alito and Roberts? And which one has not?
There's no "dilemma" to it.
Stop Giuliani ping!
Without morals they are just animals and should not be elected dog catcher!
Ridiculous. Rudy and Hillary both believe a woman’s right to choose (to murder her unborn children) is a constitutional right. Neither will seek or work to appoint or confirm pro-life judges. Either of these two power hungry liberal whores would lie, steal, cheat and sell their souls to take the White House.
PING
Observation: the lesser of two evils often gets more evil accomplished precisely because s/he doesn’t seem so bad, or is on “the right side”. Hillary will make little progress because there will be tremendous Republican opposition. Rudy would do much to advance the leftist agenda precisely because, being a Republican, he’ll get more support.
We saw exactly this in NY when switching from hardcore leftist Cuomo to allegedly right-wing Pataki: gun control and other issues got a LOT worse precisely because Pataki, a socialist at heart, automatically got the blind support of Republicans.
Sometimes the greater of two evils is the better choice: people recognize it as evil.
It's the only choice of the ENEMEDIA!!!!
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
If Julianne is elected president, we pro-lifers better be sure there is a Senate majority of Republicans and a Republican majority in the House to keep him from selling conservatism down the tubes of his own self-aggrandizement.
The closest I want Hillary to the White House is if someone drops it on her.
There is no dilemma for me. If Rudy gets the nomination, I will be up on Election Day at 5am to walk over broken glass, barbed wire, fire ants, and killer bees to vote for him against Hillary.
Hillary will destroy this country, Even Gary Bauer warned conservatives on Sean Hannity, those conservatives that think that Hillary will be another Cartesque election bounty, that if Hillary gets the White House, it could be decade before the damaged caused by HRC presidency is rectified, if we have a country. Not years, not election cycles, but decades.
I wouldn’t waste my vote on either one. The winner would claim a mandate. I will look elsewhere. If you don’t vote for someone you agree with, your position will never be known. Stand up and be counted - vote for life. Maybe in 2012, life will be respected.
KENGOR: Hillary, no question. She has made that clear. Rudy would not.
The Supreme Court is not the proper place for this battle. Although the SC "legalized" abortion, it is only because the legislative branch has abdicated it's power to the SC on this issue. To make abortion illegal, we must change the law. Either US law, or the US Constitution.
Trying to get the SC to outlaw abortion, by selecting presidents who will select jurists for that purpose, is an ineffective and detrimental means to accomplish the ends. It even sounds ridiculous. There is just too much uncertainty in the effort. Who will the president pick? Which current justice will he be replacing? Will the justice actually vote to make abortion illegal? Will following presidents simply place justices that will make abortion legal again? Even if the SC make abortion illegal, will state law trump federal law? And so on.
Anti-abortion efforts need to be refocused onto legislative action. Out of the 3 federal branches, the executive has the least amount of power to make abortion illegal. And yet, we keep banging our heads against the wall, and the unborn are still being slaughtered. No doubt, Hillary and the Rats would like us to continue with the existing strategy.
With abortion out of the equation, the choice between any Republican and Hillary should be decisively for the Republican candidate due to issues the president can be most effective at, namely, national security, the justice system, the economy, and freedom!
Rudy fails the courage test and for that reason he will not get my vote as a Catholic
Why?..Leadership takes courage. He showed plenty of courage during 9/11..However, he has abandoned the teachings of the Catholic Church which he knows so well, and has shown a lack of courage by adopting a pro-=choice (~ anti-Catholic) position for the sake of political expediency. He has also remarried and is now with his third wife-also in violation of the Church’s teachings. We worked hard for 30 years to vote for the right candidates-Republican- and to try and overturn Roe v Wade, said our Rosaries, prayed at the Masses and the Right to Life Masses, and now we are being asked to support a pro-choice Republican candidate?..No Thanks...No way!...This is a war of good vs evil..There is no compromise, only victory for one side of the other....
As for voting for the lesser of two evils?...if given a choice between two candidates- one pro-choice and one pro-euthanasia, who would you choose ?...or one who supports genocide and one who supports gulags, who would you vote for ?...a choice of lesser of two evils given two very bad choices is no choice, it is siding with the evil itself...
If Giuliani picks a pro-life running mate, that gives him the edge. Of course, are there any left? Maybe Tommy Thompson. Or perhaps Engler. Maybe Santorum. Possibly Cornyn, although you don’t want to lure him away from the Senate.