Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul wins Conservative Leadership Conference Straw Poll
Political Derby - Conservative Leadership Conference ^ | October 13th, 2007 | Stephen Fountain

Posted on 10/14/2007 4:35:45 AM PDT by Calpernia

BREAKING NEWS! Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul has won the inaugural Conservative Leadership Conference straw poll. Despite not appearing at the conference, Paul won convincingly with 33% of the vote. Mitt Romney, who addressed the conference in a town hall meeting and during a general session, finished second with 16%. Duncan Hunter, who also delivered a major address during the three-day event, finished third at 15%.

The Full Results:

Ron Paul 32.80%

Mitt Romney 16.13%

Duncan Hunter 14.52%

Undecided 11.29%

Fred Thompson 7.53%

Rudy Giuliani 6.45%

Alan Keyes 3.76%

Mike Huckabee 3.23%

Tom Tancredo 1.61%

John McCain 1.08%

Other 1.08%

Sam Brownback 0.54%


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: axisofdesperation; clc; duncanhunter; gopaulgo; mittromney; paulbearers; paulestinians; postcardfromoblivion; ronpaul; rontards; rp4prez; scampi; strawpolls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-213 next last
To: steve86

How could anyone get excited about this ridiculous pole?
I wasn’t aware he was Polish.

Ron Paulinski. Are you sure? he he


101 posted on 10/14/2007 8:13:36 AM PDT by rising tide (Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Old 300
There is a fine line between revolution and reckless...
102 posted on 10/14/2007 8:18:52 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (265 pound Lemming with attitude for Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

I’d say that our present recklessness with our monetary system and federal spending is what is actually the real unsustainable here. We are going to have a massive collapse if we do not reign in spending, lower taxes, and get our dollar on a level valuation standard. The politicians simply cannot resist printing money for their favorite causes.


103 posted on 10/14/2007 8:21:13 AM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Old 300
Fortunately for our economy and security, very few do.
104 posted on 10/14/2007 8:21:58 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (265 pound Lemming with attitude for Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

Just look at the value of the dollar over the past sixty years. It will be most unfortunate for our economy and security if we do not adopt at least some of the von Mises positions on sound money. Only Ron Paul is talking about those. I hope that the enthusiasm Americans are showing for him will at least translate into other candidates reconsidering their tepid economic policies. But I don’t have a lot of hope for that since it looks to me as if they’re mostly working for the current status quo.


105 posted on 10/14/2007 8:24:56 AM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Old 300

That has been said for years, yet were are as strong as ever. New economy, some what revolutionary.


106 posted on 10/14/2007 8:25:52 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (265 pound Lemming with attitude for Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Old 300
And we have been dealing with him ever since, but that is no reason to chuck our needed resources to the whims of the regional mad men and tribe leaders.
107 posted on 10/14/2007 8:26:14 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (265 pound Lemming with attitude for Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

That’s a very subjective view. As George Carlin says, you can’t hide inflation when everything you need costs many multiples of what it used to. We do not have a strong economy. We have spinning plates balanced carefully by the masters at the Federal Reserve.


108 posted on 10/14/2007 8:27:56 AM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Old 300
I have seen all that, and have read the Mises institute info, and agree with it in many ways. My issue is the methodology we use to “return” to the old model, and how much of that we have to adjust in light of the economic realities of today and the rest of the world, which no matter your stance on “globalism” we're are an integral part of that both politically and economically.
109 posted on 10/14/2007 8:34:13 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (265 pound Lemming with attitude for Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Old 300

I’ll keep that in mind next shopping trip...


110 posted on 10/14/2007 8:36:21 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (265 pound Lemming with attitude for Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
One thought-experiment you can attempt in the safety of your own home is to ask yourself: if things really needed to change, how would it happen with our present leadership, and the other candidates?

The more you delve into this experiment, the more you may come to realize that the deck is purposefully stacked against such change by the people with a vested interest in seeing things remain as they are, for their own benefit. If you think a little harder, you may come to realize that massive force is being exerted to keep things as they are.

You might then ask yourself: is this representative government? They answer for me is "absolutely not."

111 posted on 10/14/2007 8:37:10 AM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
I’ll keep that in mind next shopping trip...

You're well off, then. But what about the elderly on fixed incomes? What about those without medical care because of the impact of inflation in medical costs? What about the price of heating and cooling for people on fixed incomes? Inflation benefits those who get to use the money first, namely Wall Street. It hurts the poor the most. It's immoral to ignore this.

112 posted on 10/14/2007 8:39:49 AM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Old 300
One last balst then I am off for a bit.

I see what you are saying, but take it a step further. People are used to the status quo. Would someone shaking things up, swinging through the institutions we have built, for ill or naught, make things better or worse.

Many of the supporters of Paul, and others of his school of thought talk of abolishing this and cutting that as soon as possible. Two things come to mind. First it won’t happen because many of they actions have to pass through congress. Two, if they could happen, it would spiral us out of control overnight, since there would be no fall back in place.

You want change, it will have to come slowly. Find you a candidate who is less radical but just as dedicated, one who understands the concept of transition and protecting what we have during that effort. Find one who also understands the 21st century geopolitical realites. RP is not that man.

113 posted on 10/14/2007 8:44:00 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (265 pound Lemming with attitude for Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Old 300

What in a totally free market would fix this?


114 posted on 10/14/2007 8:45:19 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (265 pound Lemming with attitude for Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
Would someone shaking things up, swinging through the institutions we have built, for ill or naught, make things better or worse.

First, the damage came to us suddenly and covertly in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Act December 23, 1913. It was wholly unconstitutional, and many of the things Ron Paul wants to change are reasonably interpreted as being such. He also has plans not to just rip out the Federal Reserve but to supplant it gradually be allowing precious metals like Gold to be traded without unconstitutional excise taxes. Once that would occur, stable commodities such as Gold would immediately encourage people to stop using the unbacked dollars, and then the transition could happen over time.

None of this has to bring the house down. With sound financial policies, our economy would actually have the characteristics that you wish we had now, and seem to see (however hollow the appearance is in actuality).

We could compete with China. We could and would race back to the top of the global economy with freedom to innovate, communicate, and keep the fruits of our labor. It's truly a wonderful notion to reopen our economic system and break the shackles of control that have been placed on us by the corporatist and global socialists.

We should never fear returning to the rule of law. We should fear anything that requires us to maintain our current lawlessness.

115 posted on 10/14/2007 8:50:24 AM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Are you suggesting we support Saudi Arabia with our blood and treasure?

Please go back and find where I suggested any such thing.

116 posted on 10/14/2007 8:50:57 AM PDT by Allegra (Proud Member of the Westheimer Wonders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
What in a totally free market would fix [inflationary redistribution of wealth]?

The biggest control we have on our economy is with the Federal Reserve's management of the money supply. Without that command element, and with a sound dollar backed by gold or silver, money would keep its true value over our lifetimes. Our savings would be worth what we deposited in our youth when old age arrives, for example.

117 posted on 10/14/2007 8:52:50 AM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk; ejonesie22
Quagmire, huh? You leftists are all alike, spinning BS to suit your agenda.

This is just one of many examples of how the "quagmire" is going.

Its sickens me to see you little anti-war lefties sitting around in your Star Trek pajamas in your parents' basements belittling the efforts of people of whom you aren't even good enough to lick the bottoms of their boots.

118 posted on 10/14/2007 9:07:30 AM PDT by Allegra (Proud Member of the Westheimer Wonders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old 300

BINGO: No one stealing (inflating) wealth from someone else (the loosers here primarily the middle class, and the ‘poor’), the winner the BANKERS and their allies.

If we get rid of the fed, and end regulations of barriers to enter and exist into the market, average americans would gain real wealth not just “work for the man”..in-effect..


119 posted on 10/14/2007 11:55:48 AM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Old 300

I apologize if this has already been asked of you but do you work in any capacity for the Ron Paul campaign?


120 posted on 10/14/2007 12:00:54 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-213 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson