Posted on 10/13/2007 9:43:32 PM PDT by goldstategop
Well said. We should have learned this lesson when we put BobDole up against Clinton in hopes that revulsion of Slick would win the day. It didn't. It seems like each time the GOP has had an opportunity to offer a clear distinction, we've trotted out a slightly less-bad version of the Democrat opponent. From Nixon through the Bushes, the lone exception was Ronald Reagan.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
.
“Only Ron Paul can save us from certain disaster”
Keep repeating that with the DUers and 911 Truthers
“No war is ever neccessary”
Keep repeating that with Osama bin Laden and Cindy Sheehan
“We are doomed”
Keep repeating that into a mirror
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
There, fixed it.
The first thing those people will do is make sure that they are never out of power again.
I could supply a long list of why one should be a Conservative, but that is different than being a Republican... A vast difference, or so it seems.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
This “it’s better to lose now” attitude before even a vote is cast is what the GOP suffers from.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
“Dump Guiliani and the party unites.”
Ever since the Rudy crowd got pitched from FR there has been no uniting that I can see. In fact this place has become a political cat fight on threads about the candidates.
He did nothing of the sort. His lame-brained pseudoanalysis of the situation at hand goes no more thoughtful than his Hillary as Chemo metaphor. He pumps Ron Paul as "the only supporter of liberty in the bunch." And while Greenhut does reference another columnist's bemoaning of the Bush White House and GOP Congress' abandoning of fiscal conservatism, he spent more of his own words providing details about Rudy Giuliani's failed marriages.
The thing that reveals that Greenhut is either intellectually dishonest or just plain feeble-minded is that he writes himself in a circle as he wraps up his rant. Of Rudy, he wrote: "What the media call Giuliani's "unconventional" personal life certainly contradicts the party's support for family values." So one would think "family values" was important to him, and one aspect of the GOP he would want to hold on to, right? WRONG! Here are the third and second-last sentences in the column:
So Rudy's lack of "family values" are an important enough reason to reject him, says Greenhut, but the people who would are 'enemies of liberty' too! They're only useful when it comes to getting Hillary in to issue a near-fatal wound to the Republicans.
Even the party's social conservative wing, its most powerful grass-roots force, is ready to bolt if socially liberal Giuliani gets the nomination. Religious Right notables such as Focus on the Family's James Dobson and former presidential candidate Gary Bauer met recently in Salt Lake City to discuss backing a third-party candidate. These folks are no friends of liberty, either. Still, their defection could assure that increasingly likely Clinton victory.
Greenhut offers no ideas on how the GOP could be rebuilt, how long that would take, and doesn't factor in what could happen in the meantime, such as another devastating terrorist attack. He seems to take it on faith that the Republican Party will re-emerge from its terminal condition as something that he likes. Well, the Dems were out of the White House and a minority for six years. Now, they're back. Did they change their spots?
IMHO, Greenhut lacks the courage to say what he really seems to mean, which is: "Elect Hillary and let her kill the Republican Party dead because I want the opposition party to be the Libertarians."
It should make him objectionable to Americans!
"Freedom is about authority. Freedom is about the willingness of every
single human being to cede to lawful authority a great deal of discretion
about what you do and how you do it."-- Rudy Giuliani, New York Times, March 17, 1994
No problem, the parties are night and day.
There are many more rinos than you can count who also have to go. Rudy isn't even a drop in the bucket compared to their numbers and influence on the GOP. Many are deeply entrenched in the GOP and in leadership positions. For example, examine thoroughly the Ohio GOP for the past 30-40 years...damn near all rinos or country club republicans who worship the moderate vote.
Yep. If the Donks take the White House and hang on to Congress, America, the America we love, is done and finished.
It’s just that simple. And just that sad.
The Libertarians abandoned the GOP? I thought they had their own party. Besides, I just came away from a running gun battle with a joker who says losing the Christian Conservatives is what the GOP has to worry about, not the freakin' Libertarians.
Greenhut seems to blame President Bush for the fact that the Islamists chose his watch to unleash their war on the American homeland.
Greenhut appears to prefer a President who is more amenable to surrender than any of the current crop of Republicans except for the loopy Ron Paul.
I am not sympathetic to Greenhut, even on his issue of internal security. Railing against magined “police state” Bush Administration tactics do nothing to enhance his credibility, and in fact makes him look like he has more than one loose screw.
I think Greenhut would be more comfortable in the surrender party and suggest he move there forthwith.
Perhaps someday his children and grandchildren will find it possible to be grateful to others for the sacrifices their own forebear wasn’t willing to make to save our nation and our liberty.
Meanwhile, Steven Greenhut can take it to Air America or the daily Kos. They seem to have an appetite for this kind of drivel.
And any one who can buy into the notion that either the Republicans or the nation would be better off for a dose of President Hillary Clinton has ALL his screws in serious need of a screwdriver and a firm grip.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.