Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Captain Kirk
Actually, that definition better fits more nationalist oriented states Egypt, Pakistan, or Saudi Arabia than a missionary Islamic state such as Iran...so if Paul is "wrong" he is only wrong in not calling these states Islamofascist (that is if your defnition is accurate).

The Islamic facists want the whole world to follow their form of government. By the way, that's exactly what Hitler was trying to achieve as well.

Islamic facists is the perfect description of them, and Paul was wrong.

48 posted on 10/12/2007 9:07:31 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: MEGoody

Fine....but then don’t quote your dictionary because it doesn’t say anything of the sort. The definition from the dictionary you quote describes fascism as a nationalist or racial movement. Those words apply to the more nationalism and/or racism of Hitler, Mubarik, etc. but not to any movement that wants to impose a single religion on the entire world. BTW, there is no evidence that Hitler (unlike Stalin) particularly cared what form of government other countries, such as Bolivia, followed. His main focus was on German domination of Europe.


51 posted on 10/12/2007 9:15:26 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson