Fine....but then don’t quote your dictionary because it doesn’t say anything of the sort. The definition from the dictionary you quote describes fascism as a nationalist or racial movement. Those words apply to the more nationalism and/or racism of Hitler, Mubarik, etc. but not to any movement that wants to impose a single religion on the entire world. BTW, there is no evidence that Hitler (unlike Stalin) particularly cared what form of government other countries, such as Bolivia, followed. His main focus was on German domination of Europe.
Yep, and Islamic facists want a one world government, all run just like Afghanistan used to be.
Dictators like Saddam weren’t trying to create Utopia. For them it is all about power and what’s in it for them.
Communists become dictators believing they’re serving a higher purpose (which gives them the right to do anything) but they operate under the initial cloak of creating Utopia.
Fascist also become dictators and claim they are building Utopia as well with the same claim to serving a higher purpose with the same consequences. Their economic system is different than the communists but the end result is the same. The Communist party owns the means to production where they are in control. The Fascist party controls the means to production where they are in control. Both do so in their aim to create Utopia.