How convenient.
There is no right and wrong.
Everyone is right in his own eyes.
It's all legal, of course.
We are so civilized. So openminded, aren't we?
"My position on the subject is that I don't really know what's right. I didn't know much in the beginning... and at the end I was just as confused."
After seeing and filming defenseless human beings heartlessly dismembered, he's "confused."
That's all?
If Almighty God played god like we play god, we would never have crawled out of the dust we came from.
I would take his comments with a grain of salt. He wants people from both sides to come see it, and if he comes out as being on one side, the other side will call it propaganda and not see it. If the movie does a good job of presenting both sides, it will be a good thing.
It is difficult to produce a television documentary that is both incisive and probing when every twelve minutes one is interrupted by twelve dancing rabbits singing about toilet paper. - Rod Serling 1961
Of course only politicians and commentators have points of view. Those who create documents are innocent of having a point of view.
Norma McCorvey has a lot of blood on her hands.
..but I know this....Norma was used and discarded.
Sarah Weddington, attorney for Planned Parenthood/NARAL were looking for a 'test case' when Norma McCorvey became available .... and they did the rest.
I also know it was pro-lifers (specifically 2 daughters of pro-lifers) who reached out to 'Miss Norma' in love and acceptance and led her to repentance and God's forgiveness.
America will be judged more harshly than Nazi Germany. Hitler paid his people the compliment of believing that his murders had to be concealed. They saw the inside of the death camps only AFTER the war. No one has concealed the abortion horror from the American people. The American people have seen the bloody, dismembered corpses for three decades and counting, and the majority are unmoved. And while Hitler’s murders were carried out by an inner circle of soldiers and police, America’s holocaust has been carried out by about 30% of ALL WOMEN, with the encouragement of about 30% of ALL MEN.
MURDER IS WRONG.
This was supposedly a "cure" for all the "back alley" abortions that killed thousands of lives. However, there were statistics about deaths from illegal abortions.
In 1973, the year of Roe, there were 39 deaths from illegal abortions.
The numbers decreased dramatically after the discovery of penicillin.
<>
If the reality of the "procedure" is so horrifying that it can barely be shown, then how can it possibly be thought of as acceptable?
What in God's name could be the social imperative that would legitimize such a thing?
“It’s about as shocking as any motion picture can ever get. It’s illegal to film someone being killed,” said Kaye.
***My heart cries for these innocent little ones.
ping
Pro-Life PING
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
So why bother to make the film?
Perhaps as a nice date movie?
By sitting firmly on the fence, he may well have an audience on both sides. It sounds like the film pretty well just lays it out there. And think about it, how many pro-aborts have ever had a good look at abortion?
So much of this industry never sees the light of day. Ironically, they desperately hide behind a veil of secrecy because revealing the truth would set people against abortion.
Any lifting of that veil is a good thing. Expose the truth and let the truth take on a life of its own. Hearts will be changed. Who cares what his personal views are as long as he brings this grisly practice out into the light.
At the end of the Book of Judges (OT) it says that there was not king in Israel so every man did what was right in his own eyes. Today, liberalism/democrap party says there is no God of right and wrong, so everyone should be authorized by the almighty government to do what is right in their own eyes paid for by government extorted taxes.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0841119/
User Comments (Comment on this title)
15 out of 20 people found the following comment useful:-
Remarkable, 11 September 2006
Author: Nick Van der Graaf from Toronto, Canada
Caveat: I have been a pro-choice activist for many years in my home country of Canada, and attended the “March for Women’s Lives” in Washington D.C. in 2004. Obviously I have a pretty solid opinion on this issue, but below I have tried to just talk about the film itself.
I saw this a couple of days ago at the Toronto Film Festival. I think it is an unflinching look at the how the battle over abortion rights has played out in the United States over the last 15 years or so. It was intended to be unbiased, an even-handed look at both sides of the issue. By and large, I think Kaye succeeded at this, but I would very much like to attend a screening of this film before an audience of committed pro-lifers to see what they think of it. I couldn’t help but think that nearly all the pro-lifers interviewed came across as deeply disturbed, with a couple of exceptions.
The film clocks in at over two and a half hours and could easily loose 30 minutes without taking away from the impact of the film. Similarly it ends dreadfully - overblown music and an utterly inconsequential shot - the director having missed the perfect spot to end it 5 minutes beforehand.
Shot entirely in black and white, there are several moments of stunning beauty, contrasting with the frequently dull and suburban backgrounds in which such a passionate battle is being waged by both sides.
Overall I would definitely recommend this film, but only after it is re-edited from its present version.
A last note: Tony Kaye was present at the screening and gave an utterly bizarre performance during the Q&A at the end of the movie. He stood at the mike, rubbing his face vigorously, making little sense and often at a loss for words. We were planning to ask questions but he was so out of it that we decided not to waste our time!
In every man’s life, there is a point between dawn and sunset that he must stare intently at the sun.