Skip to comments.
Bush throws down gauntlet to China with Dalai Lama meeting
Agence France Presse ^
| 10-10-07
| P. Parameswaran
Posted on 10/10/2007 9:38:05 PM PDT by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
1
posted on
10/10/2007 9:38:06 PM PDT
by
george76
To: george76
Is it too much to hope that they take all of their junk off of our shelves and go home?
2
posted on
10/10/2007 9:39:43 PM PDT
by
Stonewall Jackson
(The Hunt for FRed November. 11/04/08)
To: george76
3
posted on
10/10/2007 9:41:16 PM PDT
by
Monkey Face
(It's time for Halloween, so practice safe hex.)
To: Stonewall Jackson
Yep. Most favored trading nation, some crazy number in dollar holdings, somehow got alot of nice tech *cough Clinton cough*. Their problems coming in the next decades will be felt elsewhere too, environmental degradation, social uprisings, demographics, face it Mr. Jackson China is here to stay.
: (
4
posted on
10/10/2007 9:43:42 PM PDT
by
Eyes Unclouded
(We won't ever free our guns but be sure we'll let them triggers go....)
To: george76; pandoraou812
This will be the first time that a sitting US president will appear with the Dalai Lama in a public event, ...Because Clinton didn't have the...what do you call them? ... cajones?
Or maybe it's because the Clintons get their biggest cash contributions from Beijing!?!
5
posted on
10/10/2007 9:50:01 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Hillary can tap Hsus but she can't tuna fish.)
To: george76
6
posted on
10/10/2007 9:50:42 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: george76
The award "has sent very serious, wrong signals to the Tibetan independence forces, seriously interfered into China's internal affairs and damaged China-US relations," Beijing said then. I hear it didn't slow down your torturing of nuns and monks in Lhasa prisons.
7
posted on
10/10/2007 9:52:54 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Hillary can tap Hsus but she can't tuna fish.)
To: TigersEye
Bingo :
because the Clintons get their biggest cash contributions from Beijing!?!
8
posted on
10/10/2007 9:53:06 PM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: TigersEye
Because Clinton didn't have the...what do you call them? ... cajones? Not meeting the Dalai Lama since he fled the Chinese would include every president since Eisenhower.
To: TigersEye
China reacted angrily when the US Congress announced the award last year
Boo hoo to China. I'm with Sassy on her boycott. After reading what they've done to the Tibetans I have nothing to say to them but as another poster said ...get bent. And I bet the Clintons took lots of cash. They need to get bent too.
10
posted on
10/10/2007 9:56:38 PM PDT
by
pandoraou812
( zero tolerance to the will of Allah & Muslims ...... dilligaf? with an efg.....)
To: TigersEye
This will be the first time that a sitting US president will appear with the Dalai Lama in a public event, ...
Because Clinton didn't have the...what do you call them? ... cajones?
Or maybe it's because the Clintons get their biggest cash contributions from Beijing!?!
Well, the Dalai Lama has been in exile since 1959 - plenty of US presidents missed the opportunity to make a statement against China's illegal takeover of Tibet. Kudos to Bush for doing so.
To: antiRepublicrat
Yes it would. Who was the last big lib in the WH. The one who could "feel your pain?" Who does the left hold up as their hero? Today, not 30, 40 or 50 years ago?
FWIW Eisenhower was out of office before or very shortly after the Dalai Lama fled Tibet. In those days (Eisenhower or JFK) had the CIA clandestinely training Tibetan resistance fighters.
12
posted on
10/10/2007 9:59:15 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Hillary can tap Hsus but she can't tuna fish.)
To: AnotherUnixGeek
13
posted on
10/10/2007 10:00:13 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Hillary can tap Hsus but she can't tuna fish.)
To: george76
Please, Bush is bent over by the Chinese...if he wants to throw down the gauntlet he should start banning contaminated Chinese exports and slap trade tarrifs on their products until they start playing by the “free trade” rules.
To: george76
The award "has sent very serious, wrong signals to the Tibetan independence forces, seriously interfered into China's internal affairs and damaged China-US relations," Beijing said then. "Internal affairs"? Wasn't Tibet an independent state before Maoist China invaded it? Why isn't that invasion considered an act of genocidal aggression by the Security Council?
15
posted on
10/10/2007 10:12:21 PM PDT
by
montag813
(1)
To: george76
If there was any justice or logic in the world, the UN and the intelligentsia would be hellbent on freeing Tibet and her Bhuddist monks as opposed to “Palestine” and her suicide bombers.
16
posted on
10/10/2007 11:01:43 PM PDT
by
Maynerd
(Hilary = amnesty and socialized medicine)
To: All
Isn’t there a FReeper named dial-up lama or something?
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; Dialup Llama
Isnt there a FReeper named dial-up lama or something? You mean Dialup Lhama? ;-)
18
posted on
10/10/2007 11:39:15 PM PDT
by
SteveH
(First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
To: Stonewall Jackson
Is it too much to hope that they take all of their junk off of our shelves and go home?In the short term, yep.
Long term implications? Well, the Chinese, when they manufacture goods for American corporations, subsidize the construction of factories and the "molds" used in any fabrication process. The government owns the molds.
So say you are manufacturing "Star Wars" toys and due to the "quality fade" factor the next batch of "Obi Wan" dolls has a new force power called "Force Lead Poisoning": You jump up and down and tell the factory, "We're cancelling our order!".
Well, you can't just get up and walk away. The Chinese own the molds and you have to start all over again somewhere else, and you can bet it won't be in China. Then you have to start from scratch somewhere else, and your profit margins going to take a beating. So your shareholders are screaming and you'll probably lay off half your lower end staff here at home.
The next day, some nameless Chinese company launches it's new "Star Wares" toy line at half the cost of the goods you've just imported.
Sleep with a dog and wake up with fleas...same old story.
Over the short haul, we won't see much change. Long term? We may see nominal improvements in quality even with "quality fade". Enough to entice manufacturing to remain there. Remember PT Barnum's words...
19
posted on
10/11/2007 2:59:51 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: george76
President Bush had better be careful, he may screw up his money train from the chi-coms after he gets out of office.
20
posted on
10/11/2007 3:09:42 AM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson