To: Suzy Quzy
I would have emphasized ORIGINAL instead of destroyed. He destroyed documents that had not been cataloged or copied yet ... there are now NO other references to what Burglar destroyed at the direction of Clinton!
9 posted on
10/10/2007 3:58:43 PM PDT by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
Lets not forget whose DOJ “prosecuted” this case.....
To: Red_Devil 232
Yes, but I emphasised DESTROYED because the news reports always say “STOLE or REMOVED” meaning the Archives got them back....Burglar DESTROYED ORIGINAL CLASSIFED DOCS which we will NEVER know what they contained and he got NO PUNISHMENT!!!! I DETEST the BUSH JUSTICE DEPT!! OXYMORON.
40 posted on
10/11/2007 6:23:08 AM PDT by
Suzy Quzy
(Hillary '08...Her PHONINESS is REAL!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson