Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cowboy Bob
Well I don't know if they have a trust fund or not, or if/where they get additional money, and I don't care. It does not matter.

These are people who have the ability to take care of their own, regardless. They did not do that.

My only problem with these parents is that they do not provide insurance for their children and make taxpayers do it for them, when they are perfectly able to do so themselves.

200 posted on 10/09/2007 8:33:13 AM PDT by teenyelliott (Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: teenyelliott
Dear teenyelliott,

“These are people who have the ability to take care of their own, regardless. They did not do that.”

Actually, they did that very well, apparently.

They just did it using other people’s money.

Barring evidence of fraud on their part (and I don’t see much evidence of that), they seem to have done it legally and above-board.

The question isn’t whether these parents were taking care of their children. They were.

The question is whether the law should be written to make it possible for them to take care of their children at taxpayers’ expense, especially of folks who likely would have managed to find a way to afford health insurance if this program hadn't been available.


sitetest

210 posted on 10/09/2007 8:43:07 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson