Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: teenyelliott
Dear teenyelliott,

“These are people who have the ability to take care of their own, regardless. They did not do that.”

Actually, they did that very well, apparently.

They just did it using other people’s money.

Barring evidence of fraud on their part (and I don’t see much evidence of that), they seem to have done it legally and above-board.

The question isn’t whether these parents were taking care of their children. They were.

The question is whether the law should be written to make it possible for them to take care of their children at taxpayers’ expense, especially of folks who likely would have managed to find a way to afford health insurance if this program hadn't been available.


sitetest

210 posted on 10/09/2007 8:43:07 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]


To: sitetest
I certainly never said that what they did was illegal. It is, however, scummy.

They most certainly did not take care of their own. They simply enrolled their kids in a government funded program that allowed other people to pay their bills.

If you think that is taking care of your own, you and I have very different opinions of what it means to be conservative.

219 posted on 10/09/2007 8:52:53 AM PDT by teenyelliott (Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson