I never became ‘enthralled’ with this woman. I found her to be naive, and more bimbo than Princess. Events proved I was correct in my original assessment.
I never became ‘enthralled’ with this woman. I found her to be naive, and more bimbo than Princess. Events proved I was correct in my original assessment.”
___________________________________
Ditto....a slut is a slut is a slut.
Yep.....I remember co-worker women where I worked stayed up till 2-3am to watch THE wedding......I thought that was rather stupid....and I was in the perfect age group and life stage (single and 30) to be enthralled with it all. HA...knowing what’s important in life....maybe that’s the key to a LONG life.
Sure, blame the woman, call her a bimbo. What about the vow that Charles took? He had as much obligation to honor them for queen and country as Diana did.
Certainly she was nieve, as young brides are, expecting him to honor her as his wife, not to make a fool of her with Camilla. Charles had a right to buck the palace and the crown and marry Camilla if that's what he really wanted. Instead he was a coward, a liar and a cheat and a sneak.
The woman who 'had it all' had everything except what she wanted most of all - a marriage. She grew beautifully into her position as a royal, being considered a commoner. And she was a fantastic mother, raising at least one balanced and worth-while son.
I'm sure it was a great sadness to her that she was forced to look elsewhere for the affection and love due her from her husband.
Charles is the cad here and IMHO he killed her as sure as if he'd plunged a knife into her - which he did; he plunged a knife into her heart. It is unforgiveable to give him a pass on honoring his marriage vows.
What gives with you conservatives anyway? She certainly did not start it.