Posted on 10/08/2007 8:00:54 AM PDT by Rummyfan
Last week, a London court began pondering the vexed question of whether Diana, Princess of Wales was, ahem, murdered. There was so much public suspicion, declared the coroner, Lord Justice Scott Baker, that it was time for the rumors to be either "dispelled or substantiated."
So who killed her? On the night of Diana's death, there were apparently two top agents for MI6, the British secret service, on the loose in Paris, and possibly a third, if you believe Henri Paul, the chauffeur, was also on the spooks' payroll. That's the theory of Mohammed Fayed, Messr. Paul's employer and father of the princess' last boyfriend Dodi. Mr. Fayed asserts Diana at the time of her death was carrying Dodi's baby, and thus the car crash was arranged because Buckingham Palace decided it would be unacceptable for Prince William, the future king, to have a Muslim step-brother, a Muslim stepdad, and a soon-to-be-Muslim mom.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Another alternate could have been 'my fellow conservatives'.
Diana was a high profile woman, not a saint. A compassionate conservative might have seen many of her actions for what they were. A plea to her husband to honor her and his vows.
-PJ
Tell that to the perps - they’re the last to think so.
Since she didn’t, it was an inappropriate name.
Oh, now I have to look up words for which you have used or misspelled, Mister. Shoot, I forgot about our bet with “spendthrift.” I thought it was two words.
;^)
Thank you!
Harry
Hewitt
Charles in 1970, close to Harry's age.
Just an observation.
I have no idea if those are actual facts or just things you "read about" or "heard about". I certainly am not going to do any research on it, as I am not here to debate some kid's DNA. As I said, I don't care one way or another.
However, as a grown up, name calling is just silly. If you have an argument, make it. If you have a fact, post it. If all you can offer is "Slut!!!!!!", then you just look like a child.
If you were the Queen, would you allow it?
-the young prince does not have the same nose as charles......looks much more like the riding instructor to me......right down to the hair color.
Not both of them.
LOL.
Just Harry.
William is the heir.
-sorry, william doesn’t look so much like charles either........now that you have openned THAT can of worms you can’t put the lid back on.
Yup.
I wouldn’t change lives with “the princess” for a second.
I’m glad my Mom bought me Noddy books, and the ugly swan.
Now those were good stories.
;-)
That picture that came out a few days ago certainly looked like a bright light had been flashed into the eyes of the driver and her bodyguard (who is seen lowering the visor).
I remember a British journalist saying that he had always considered their wedding a sham, that Charles had married Diana only because he was pushed by his parents, who were concerned about an heir.
Probably Prince Charles's biggest mistake was one a lot of people make: they goof around during their young (& more marriageable) years, then finally decide (or have) to get married. The problem is, by then the eligible mates are no longer around.
So what does Charles do? "Bargain-hunting": he had to settle for a pretty but vapid girl, who had nothing in common with him but who was at least young & virginal. These marriages work as long as the other partner doesn't grow. The problem was, Diana did. And she realized she was conned.
However, I can't say Diana got a raw deal, considering she loved the spotlight, & became famous only because she married Charles. She probably should have been more aware of what she was getting into.
I heard you are a terrible cook.
HAHAHA
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.