Replies

Again, you’re not listening. It’s not that I don’t favor it. It’s that I don’t think it’s going to be achieved.

What has been accomplished in 34 years of trying to change the law? Nothing. You want to keep on this path? God bless you.

I say the political arena is not where this fight is won.

Finally, I really don’t care if you give your imprematur to my pro-life bonafides, but when you accused me of being a libertarian and a Ron Paul supporter, I laughed like I haven’t laughed in a long time.

It tends to support my point that those who have become fixated, abortion-is-my-issue-and-the-only-issue people simply cannot see anything except through the lens of abortion, which is how someone like you could think someone like me is a libertarian.

You have understandably avoided the question as to why there is no federal solution but only "state" solutions which certainly sounds like unjustified "federalism" to me. If you don't want to fight to end the Holocaust once and for all federally, no one can make you, but I also note the absence of specifics in whatever you might CLAIM to have been doing instead.

BTW, my issues also include guns (I was also a volunteer lawyer for NRA members), marriage, military, destruction of the Islamofascisti and others BUT the abortion issue unless and until successfully resolvedby prohibition of abortion NATIONALLY, is the top issue. If it isn't your #1, then go work on what you actually care about and stop posing as though you were a prolifer just because you say so and further posing as though you have some authority to lecture activist pro-lifers as to why they should surrender on the federal law and lecture Christians that it is somehow their Biblical responsibility to knuckle under to federal Caesar babykillers rather than destroying the babykillers.

BTW, I would have pegged you for a supporter of Julie Annie.

Also, I am listening but, for a writer, you are not particularly persuasive. If you don't want to end the ENTIRE abortion Holocaust by federal means, don't blame me for calling you a libertarian.

Ending abortion in Connecticut will not stop the trains from bringing the pregnant moms to kill their babies in NY. What you are advocating is surrender on the issue. At most, your idea might stop 10%, primarily by inconveniencing the killers.

If you think that minisolutions on a state by state basis over several centuries is the way to go, you won't be offended when we surprise you with a federal SCOTUS personhood decision.

Again, before you give prolifers advice, what are YOU doing to effectuateYOUR proposed solution. You have no more right to draft prolifers to YOUR "solution" than they have to draft you to theirs. Of course, we don't really know what "solution" you have been working toward or what you have done. Will we?