Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Clear Rivers
Bush taking Mexico’s side on illegal alien criminals. Now there’s a surprise. /sarc
36 posted on
10/07/2007 8:45:19 AM PDT by
Pelham
( "Because if they didn't vote for a lizard," said Ford, "the wrong lizard might get in. Got any gin?)
To: Clear Rivers
To: Clear Rivers
The president wants to enforce a decision by the International Court of Justice that found the convictions of Medellin and 50 other Mexican-born prisoners violated their rights to legal help as outlined in the 1963 Vienna Convention. Nothing to see here, just move along. Let's go post on the "Pray for President Bush" thread or the "Day in the Life" thread. Ooh, look at the President's dog Barney! He's swuch a widdle sweetheart!
To: Clear Rivers
I remember that crime. I was in Houston then. Put the scum to DEATH.
45 posted on
10/07/2007 10:49:46 AM PDT by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
To: Clear Rivers
He was sentenced to deasth in 1994, nearly 14 years ago...
why is he still breathing?
The two girls, age 14 and 16 are long dead...after a brutal gang-rape...
They were not given leniency...
To: Clear Rivers
Here is a compromise, send their dead bodies back to Mexico for burial. ;)
49 posted on
10/07/2007 3:32:38 PM PDT by
anymouse
To: Clear Rivers
IF it was anyone but a Mexican Bush would let them fry. What is it with him? He is selling America down the river because of his love of Mexicans/Mexico. They need to tell Bush to kiss off and zap this murderer.
50 posted on
10/07/2007 3:36:58 PM PDT by
NRA2BFree
(It*s time for "Tea Party II" This time we*ll meet at the border and toss Mexicans back over it.)
To: Clear Rivers
This is One of those Things that Makes me Feel Like Banging my Head Against the Table.
51 posted on
10/09/2007 7:42:59 AM PDT by
Kitty Mittens
(To God Be All Excellent Praise!!)
To: Clear Rivers
Bush is a scumbag. His allegence to Mexico is greater than to America. The Dixie Chicks were right. I’m ashamed Bush is from Texas.
To: Clear Rivers
There’s one slight ray of hope. It seems the SCOTUS may be pi$$ed that Bush is inserting himself in court affairs. If the courts feel their power is stepped on, they may go against him. The bad thing is the Intl court wants a new trial, so they may think they have to defer to other judges.
My view is if any official, court or executive even mentions International courts or law, they need to face impeachment. They took an oath to uphold and defend American law. If they even give a whit about Intl law, they have abandoned their oath.
64 posted on
10/10/2007 7:31:45 AM PDT by
chuckles
To: Clear Rivers
Can someone please explain to me how a treaty that was *not* ratified by 2/3 of the US Senate is binding upon the state of Texas?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
