Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel may have tricked Syria radars to hide raid
Herald Sun (Aus) ^ | October 06, 2007 12:38pm | From correspondents in Washington

Posted on 10/06/2007 9:39:13 AM PDT by Perdogg

ISRAELI fighter planes may have managed to escape detection by Syrian radars during their September 6 raid by forcing the detection system to make a mistake, Aviation Week magazine reported.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS: airstrikes; decm; israel; sept62007; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2007 9:39:15 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

So, they developed an electronic fifth-columnist?

Kinky!!


2 posted on 10/06/2007 9:41:47 AM PDT by Loud Mime (Life was better when cigarette companies could advertise and lawyers could not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
The Syrians sure have been quiet. I suspect three things:

1) Downright embarrassment.

2) They were up to no good.

3) They're not about to try to get the sympathy of the [insert Kofi voice here] "international community".

3 posted on 10/06/2007 9:44:12 AM PDT by n230099 ("Obama wouldn't know the difference between an RPG and a bong." John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Oh, those devious Jews. What will they think of next?

:-D )))

Seriously, state-of-the-art bang-bang. Well done.


4 posted on 10/06/2007 9:44:35 AM PDT by RichInOC (KATZ: HOW ARE YOU GENTLEMEN!! DESTRUCTION ARE ON THE WAY TO YOU. HA HA HA HA....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I bet they got that guy from “ NUMBERS” TV show to put fake algorithms into the Syrian detection device, thus thwarting them “seeing” the incoming.
Freegards,
Lex


5 posted on 10/06/2007 9:46:55 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Still using a lot of Soviet surplus I would guess.


6 posted on 10/06/2007 9:48:03 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
No, they have the latest Soviet technology... same junk the rooskies sold Tehran.

LLS

7 posted on 10/06/2007 9:51:38 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; txflake

ping


8 posted on 10/06/2007 9:55:32 AM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Remember when a defector flew a state-of-the art MIG to Turkey or someplace the USSR and we got to examine it very carefully? Everyone one in the intelligence community was convinced this was THE warplane of the its day. There was constant concern over how well our newest of the time would stand up against it in battle. Turns out, much to everyone’s surprise, the electronics on board were still vacuum tube, not a solid-state device to be found. The skeptics who wanted us to negotiate with the Soviets tried to tell us the lack of solid-state avionics was on purpose, to make the aircraft less susceptible to EMI that would come come nuclear war. BS. The US leads the world in military equipment and manpower.

Seems like every time we come up against a highly touted army, air force or navy it turns out to be a rout.

The Syrians, and the Iranians for that matter, have purchased a pig in a poke by buying their entire defense system from the Russians.

I know it’s folly to underestimate an enemy, but we’re good and we need to remember that!

9 posted on 10/06/2007 9:56:58 AM PDT by jwparkerjr (Sigh . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

This may be more than a decade old, but didn’t some air force try to get into it with planes that needed to close to three miles to have a chance with our planes that took them out at twelve.

DK


10 posted on 10/06/2007 10:03:34 AM PDT by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

I can picture a bunch of ay-rabs picking over the rubble of their air defense site, pulling out a module with “made in Israel” stamped on the id plate ... “Achmed, you blithering idiot, you sleep with the goats tonight.”


11 posted on 10/06/2007 10:05:59 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded; shield; All

http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=4647


12 posted on 10/06/2007 10:14:39 AM PDT by Perdogg (Join the NCAA basketball thread - Freemail me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

I think you are talking about Victor Belenko’s defection in a MiG 25 to Japan back in the 1970s.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MiG-25


13 posted on 10/06/2007 10:30:16 AM PDT by Ronin (Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

“The US leads the world in military equipment and manpower.” Neither assertion is correct.


14 posted on 10/06/2007 10:31:03 AM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

Captain Alexander Zuyev flew his MiG-29 to Trabzon, Turkey on May 20, 1989.

In 1976, a pilot with his MIG-25 defected to Japan.

Viktor Belenko was the pilot. Belenko was granted asylum by then US President Gerald Ford, and a trust fund was set up for him, granting him a very comfortable living in later years. The US interrogated and debriefed him for 5 months after his defection, and employed him as a consultant for several years thereafter.

The MiG was disassembled, examined, and returned to the USSR in thirty crates. Belenko brought with him the pilot’s manual for the Foxbat, expecting to assist American pilots in evaluating and testing the aircraft. However, the Japanese government only allowed the US to examine the plane and do ground tests of the radar and engines.


15 posted on 10/06/2007 10:33:15 AM PDT by ASOC (Yeah, well, maybe - but can you *prove* it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
Seems like every time we come up against a highly touted army, air force or navy it turns out to be a rout.

I would argue that the 'routs' are much more due to the fact that the US & certain other Westernized nations have more realistic training. We could probably swap equipment with our opponents & the outcome would be the same. Just look at how well the Israelis have done historically. Until the 70's you could argue that their equipment was on balance inferior to that of their opponents. Yet look at the spankings they gave to their Arab opponents in '56 & '67.

16 posted on 10/06/2007 10:33:20 AM PDT by Tallguy (Climate is what you plan for, weather is what you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Stillwaters
From the article posted in the link:

The technology allows users to invade communications networks, see what enemy sensors see and even take over as systems administrator to manipulate sensors into positions to hide an approaching aircraft, the report said.

17 posted on 10/06/2007 10:36:22 AM PDT by lonevoice (It's always "Apologize to a Muslim Hour"...somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

How Israel spoofed Syria

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/10/how-israel-spoo.html


18 posted on 10/06/2007 10:39:31 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

19 posted on 10/06/2007 10:45:12 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: n230099

I would offer a fourth option:

4. They’re gob-smacked that the promised performance of the Russian Strelets anti-aircraft systems turned out to be *wildly* over-stated.

Think about it for a moment: the Syrians have been buying modern Russian systems (Strelets AA systems), as have the Persians, and spending upwards of a billion bucks between the two of them on these systems.

If these systems were installed and active, the success of Israel’s AF on this raid means that they have learned of, or created a way, to bypass these modern Russian AA systems.

And if Israel knows how to do this... then so do we.

The Syrians are being quiet, because they’re in a very difficult position:

a) say nothing, and let the west ponder and postulate about how Israel conducted the raid with the Strelets systems being in place...

b) complain about the attack (thereby confirming it) and invite questions and analysis.

My bet is that they’re hoping that this receives scant attention in the media. Because the more attention it receives, the more vulnerable they look, and, the more vulnerable Iran looks. Iran has been buying a snootful of these Strelets systems with the idea that they could make a US or Israeli attack on Iran very costly.

The success of Israel’s raid on Syria makes Iran’s chest-pounding about their AA defenses look silly.


20 posted on 10/06/2007 10:55:13 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson