Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Getting High on Limbaugh
RealClearPolitics ^ | 10/6/2007 | Jack Kelly

Posted on 10/06/2007 7:26:22 AM PDT by mmanager

"Maybe he was just high on his drugs again," said Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa. "But that shouldn't be an excuse." That sounds suspiciously like the sort of personal attack Democrats claim to decry. And Sen. Harkin was just one of an impressive number of big foot Democrats to take to the Senate floor last Monday to calumniate conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh.

It's odd enough to have the Senate Majority Leader, his deputy, and the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, among others, take up the Senate's time to attack a radio talk show host, instead of, say, working on the appropriations bills that were supposed to have been enacted into law before the new fiscal year began Oct. 1st. But there was something odder still about Monday's performance.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: democratparty; fundedbysoros; lovablefuzzball; mediamatters; rats; rush; rushlimbaugh; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: GOP_Lady
And it’s hard to believe that he said it while on the floor of the United States Senate. (shaking my head)

He probably chose that venue because he has absolute immunity for anything he says there. Which makes the smear even lower.

21 posted on 10/06/2007 8:34:38 AM PDT by freespirited (All great truths begin as blasphemies. -- George Bernard Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

That two in the last month that I know of.


22 posted on 10/06/2007 8:35:12 AM PDT by mware (By all that you hold dear..on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Yep, and it shows his true character and lack of any type of class, doesn’t it?


23 posted on 10/06/2007 8:36:51 AM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mmanager
"[Democrat]senators trooped to the floor. No longer merely deceived, they were now deceivers themselves."

The makings of a bumper sticker.

24 posted on 10/06/2007 8:41:14 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Planting trees to offset carbon emissions is like drinking water to offset rising ocean levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

You got it. I even heard liberal RAT Bob Beckel denounce him on FOX as way out of line for the drug comment.


25 posted on 10/06/2007 8:42:04 AM PDT by freespirited (All great truths begin as blasphemies. -- George Bernard Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GitmoSailor
"I smell Hillary!!!!!!!...... Hillary can not win with Rush on the air!!!!!!!............"

Rush also played quotes of Hillary accepting responsibility for starting Media Matters.

26 posted on 10/06/2007 8:43:15 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Planting trees to offset carbon emissions is like drinking water to offset rising ocean levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mmanager
Title should be "Getting Higher". They are wishing they would have never took the hit. Becoming a bad trip for them.

I somewhat disagree with this. The Dem's intent was to placate their base after blinking in the whole "General Betrayus" MoveOn thing. They're leveraging the contrived Limbaugh situation to win back their base ... and more importantly their base's $$$$$. I've been amazed at how, on the left side of the blogosphere, the partisanship pimps are out in force telling the nutroots how the proper way to show their disgust with Limbaugh is to sent in more money ...

Dingy and the Dems are betting that the "fight" with Limbaugh won't persist past the point of diminishing fundraising returns ...
27 posted on 10/06/2007 8:44:05 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

28 posted on 10/06/2007 8:46:07 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davisfh

Max Cleland or McClelan. The Max is right. The last is close.


29 posted on 10/06/2007 8:57:59 AM PDT by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mmanager
Jane Hamsher, a liberal Web logger, thinks its an effort to compensate for the embarrassment Democrats suffered over the MoveOn.org ad attacking the patriotism of Gen. David Petraeus.

This is the most likely explanation I have heard for why the Democrats are trying to create a scandal around Rush. It seems to me that the Democrats are close to insane because:

1. They lost to Bush twice

2. The radical left is where the money is (Soros, MoveOn.org), but it's not where the majority is

3. The Democrats have no moral compass, no way to take a principled stand on anything

4. The Democratic leaders are all self-serving, unprincipled egotists

5. They know they have to strike out somehow and take the high road on some issue relating to God or country. But they don't have a clue how to do this. They are completely out of touch with anyone who is religious or patriotic. They might as well be talking to Martians.

30 posted on 10/06/2007 9:00:02 AM PDT by Rocky (Dan Rather and the NYT: Fake but accurate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davisfh
Probably Max Cleland.

As they were getting off the helicopter, Max saw the grenade on the ground and he instinctively went for it. Soldiers in combat don't leave grenades lying around on the ground. Later, in the hospital, he said he thought it was his own but I doubt the concept of "ownership" went through his mind in the split seconds involved in reaching for the grenade.

The True Story of Max Cleland's Vietnam Injuries

31 posted on 10/06/2007 9:00:34 AM PDT by Enterprise (Those who "betray us" also "Betray U.S." They're called DEMOCRATS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ontap
Tom Harkin posseses neither honor or dignity.

It takes a truly arrogant and shame-less person to say what he did right in front of God and everybody. He should be hiding in the closet.

It is equally shameful that the people of Iowa keeps on electing this reprobate to our Senate.....

.....absolutely shameful.....

32 posted on 10/06/2007 9:01:45 AM PDT by B.O. Plenty (Give war a chance......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Sentors have immunity from defamation lawsuits if they defame citizens from the senate floor?


33 posted on 10/06/2007 9:05:49 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: davisfh

Max Cleland


34 posted on 10/06/2007 9:05:51 AM PDT by Newfy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GitmoSailor

First she got rid of Imus. Now Rush.


35 posted on 10/06/2007 9:07:37 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: davisfh

Thank you for the information. Loved the film “Dirty Harry.”

The idiot of whom you are thinking is Max Cleland. He should have been given the Darwin Award.

My best regards and am glad I could be of some help.


36 posted on 10/06/2007 9:07:37 AM PDT by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mmanager
"Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel" so the old saying goes. If radio listenership were print, Limbaugh would be buying ink by the super tanker.

I don't know what the liberals are attempting to accomplish by attacking Rush. Their real objective is in attempting to reestablish the relevancy of the MSM and, in typical liberal fashion, instead of making the MSM perform better they are attempting to make it appear better by trying to diminish its competition. All they have accomplished is to solidify the right against them and the MSM.

37 posted on 10/06/2007 9:09:33 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davisfh; GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
Rush coined "Dingy Harry" a couple of years ago...

His first name was "Dusty Harry" but changed it a couple of days later to "Dingy" because "dingy" suits Reid better than merely "dusty"...

....dust is only skin deep....dingy goes all the way to the bone

38 posted on 10/06/2007 9:10:23 AM PDT by B.O. Plenty (Give war a chance......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: abclily
Sentors have immunity from defamation lawsuits if they defame citizens from the senate floor?

Yes. they do. It's an aspect of the separation-of-powers concept and spelled out in the Constitution. Any holding of them to account must be done by the Congress itself. It can't be done by the Executive or Judicial branches of the government.

39 posted on 10/06/2007 9:18:02 AM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: abclily

The Speech or Debate Clause (found in Article I, Section 6, Clause 1) in the United States Constitution states that members of both Houses of Congress

“...shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their attendance at the Session of their Respective Houses, and in going to and from the same, and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.”


40 posted on 10/06/2007 9:18:14 AM PDT by nhoward14 (Fred Thompson will get it DUN DUN in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson