To: Southack
"Your own link in your above post mentions falsification criteria. It just didn't hand-feed you by using those 2 specific words." First you wanted published specific peer-reviewed falsification criteria for evolutionary theory alone, and not for any other scientific theory. Now youll settle for it to be refutable by any conceivable event. Excellent, were in agreement. Published specific peer review is not necessary and never has been for any theory to be considered scientific.
Thanks for your time. I've got to get busy and make up for time lost now...
88 posted on
10/05/2007 7:57:57 AM PDT by
elfman2
("As goes Fallujah, so goes central Iraq and so goes the entire country" -Col Coleman, USMC ,4/2004)
To: elfman2
"Excellent, were in agreement. Published specific peer review is not necessary..." Don't you wish!
I'm afraid that you'll have to cling to such fantasies considering that your pet theory isn't up to the test, though.
91 posted on
10/05/2007 8:00:56 AM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson