[BenLurkin]

This could leave pupils with gaps in their scientific knowledge,

Missing evolution lessons will not prevent these kids from growing up to design spacecraft, build nuclear power plants or develop the cure to cancer.

They'll be no better or worse as scientists.

[MrB]

Scientific discovery tended (before the secular socialist movement) to actually affirm the existence of the Creator.

Everything from the fact that the Universe had a beginning to the exact balance of universal forces & laws to earth’s very exact position in the cosmos points to “design”.

[John Leland 1789]

You are correct. ANY science that can be tested in a laboratory now presents no problem to a Christian or other creationist. One who believes in a literal interpretation of the Genesis account can learn and apply just as much about space age physics, technology, medicine, engineering, etc., as any Darwinianist.

To apply any science correctly requires real time laboratory, clinical and on-site testing and trials that can be observed and measured now. What a Darwinianist conjectures may have happened 40 billion years ago is irrelavant.

There have always been creationist Christians in places like MIT, NASA, and the Mayo Clinic. Creationism doesn’t hinder their work, not does what they discover in a laboratory offend their Christianity.

[mysterio]

Missing evolution lessons will not prevent these kids from growing up to design spacecraft, build nuclear power plants or develop the cure to cancer. They'll be no better or worse as scientists.

Incorrect.