[allmendream]

So in other words you have nothing but some unknown function for the majority of DNA that somehow does something, but you know it isn’t involved in coding for or facilitating protein production?

And for this you say we are abandoning old ideas of DNA data storage? One idea doesn’t even slightly follow from the other. If you are revising your remarks to ‘abandoning ideas of how the data in DNA got there’ then I drop my objection. Otherwise you couldn’t possibly be more incorrect.

[Southack]

You definitely appear confused.

I gave you a link to show you that old ideas about DNA are limited to a mere 1.5% of our genetic code, yet still you cling to that small 1.5% of the picture.

The larger 98.5% view will offer more rational explanations for DNA data storage, data processing, code re-use, generational and species code skipping, code/data duplication/replication, et al.

That fact should be neither surprising nor confusing.