According to you, the criteria for evolution to be scientific is that it must have a published specific peer-reviewed falsification criteria - which I showed was not the standard for all other scientific theories and invited you to show otherwise. You refused to even address it.
But you say the criteria for ID be scientific is just that Gods an answer for any system which you think there is no basis. One bar ridiculously high, one bar absurdly low - equals one pathetic appearance on FR today.
ASA Vets right, enough times been spent on this. Regards
ID is not dependent on God. Any intelligence could suffice.
This is why Intelligent Design explains, scientifically, all modern transgenic animals such as pigs that have their DNA modified such that they grow human hormones in our labs.
Evolutionary Theory fails to explain those sorts of transgenic animals, by the way...