Skip to comments.
Scholars explain president's plan for a North American Union
Bend Weekly ^
| 10/5/07
| Phyllis Schlafly
Posted on 10/05/2007 6:05:05 AM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
"The SPP process is the vehicle for the discussion of future arrangements for economic integration to create a single market for goods and services in North America."
That give me warm and fuzzies. /s
Go Hunter!!
1
posted on
10/05/2007 6:05:07 AM PDT
by
pissant
To: pissant
2
posted on
10/05/2007 6:05:59 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Michael Medved has some real open borders bona fides. I heard him just last week pimping for amnesty, yet again.
3
posted on
10/05/2007 6:07:20 AM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: AuntB; Calpernia; Kimberly GG
4
posted on
10/05/2007 6:08:12 AM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: pissant
This alone is another reason to doubt and fear that any of the top tier of candidates are opposed to this.
I guess they plan to bypass the people. Hunter is about the only one to trust regaring this issue.
5
posted on
10/05/2007 6:15:51 AM PDT
by
dforest
(Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
To: pissant
This agenda is sneaking up on us!
6
posted on
10/05/2007 6:16:42 AM PDT
by
Dudoight
To: pissant
2006 (First Quarter) INS/FBI Statistical Report on Undocumented Immigrants
CRIME
* 95 % of Warrants in LOS ANGELES are for ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 83 % of Warrants for MURDER in Phoenix Arizona are FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 86 % of Warrants for MURDER in Albuquerque New Mexico are for ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 75 % of those on the most wanted list in Los Angeles, Phoenix, Albuquerque are ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 24.9 % OF ALL INMATES in California detention centers are Mexican Nationals here ILLEGALLY
* 40.1 % of all inmates in Arizona detention centers are Mexican Nationals here ILLEGALLY
* 29 % (630,000) Convicted ILLEGAL ALIENS felons fill our state and federal prisons at the cost of $1.5 Billion Annually
* 53 % Plus of all investigated burglaries reported in California, New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona and Texas are perpetrated by ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 50 % Plus of all gang members in Los Angeles are ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 71 % Plus of all apprehended Cars stolen in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and California were stolen by ILLEGAL ALIENS or "Transport Coyotes "
* 47 % of cited / stopped Drivers in California have NO License, NO Insurance, and NO Registration for the vehicle of that 47 %, over 92 % were ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 63 % of cited / stopped Drivers in Arizona have NO License, NO Insurance, and NO Registration for the vehicle of that 63 %, over 97 % are ILLEGAL ALIENS
* 66 % of cited / stopped Drivers in New Mexico have NO License, NO Insurance, and NO Registration for the vehicle Of that 66 %, over 98 % were ILLEGAL ALIENS
7
posted on
10/05/2007 6:18:17 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: pissant
No. Anyone who is allowed in the United States of America must understand and consent to uphold the United States Constitution. Live free or die!
8
posted on
10/05/2007 6:21:42 AM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
To: pissant
9
posted on
10/05/2007 6:30:38 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
To: Diogenesis
10
posted on
10/05/2007 6:31:35 AM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
To: davidosborne; airborne; Antoninus; GulfBreeze; processing please hold; RasterMaster; ...
11
posted on
10/05/2007 6:31:48 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
To: pissant
....Integration" with Mexico and Canada is exactly what North American union means, but there's a big problem with this goal. "We the people" of the United States were never asked if we want to be "integrated" with Mexico and Canada, two countries of enormously different laws, culture, concept of government's role, economic system and standard of living.... The most important feature of the SPP design is that it is neither intended to produce a treaty nor an executive agreement like the NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) that would require congressional ratification or the passage of implementing legislation in the United States. The SPP was designed to function within existing administrative authority of the executive branch.... The design of the SPP is innovative, eschewing the more traditional diplomatic and trade negotiation models in favor of talks among civil service professionals and subject matter experts with each government. This design places the negotiation fully within the authority of the executive branch in the United States.... Indeed, the Security and Prosperity Partnership is very "innovative." The arrogance of the Security and Prosperity Partnership's "design" to give the executive branch full "authority" to "enforce and execute" whatever is decided by a three-nation agreement of "civil service professionals," as though it were "law," is exceeded only by its unconstitutionality. What, if anything, can now be construed as Treason?
To: pissant
To: pissant
Thanks for posting, its a good article.
I’m just glad we all united to shoot down the amnesty bill. The bills’ defeat hurt the fast tracking of the NAU. I am sure W was embarrased when he met with his counterparts in Canada this past month to talk to them about its defeat. Remember, he promised those distracters that he would see them in the Rose Garden signing the Immigration (amnesty bill).
Hope we still have a fighting chance to continue to defeat the bill and because we the people will not be able to vote on the NAU, that it too is defeated.
Thanks again for the post.
14
posted on
10/05/2007 6:54:35 AM PDT
by
rineaux
(Just say NO to taglines)
To: indylindy
15
posted on
10/05/2007 6:59:05 AM PDT
by
Quix
(GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
To: Calpernia
16
posted on
10/05/2007 7:03:19 AM PDT
by
CJ Wolf
To: 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; AlwaysFree; ...
17
posted on
10/05/2007 7:05:02 AM PDT
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
To: pissant
>>”The SPP process is the vehicle for the discussion of future arrangements for economic integration to create a single market for goods and services in North America.”<<
That sounds an awful like like free trade and very similar to what Ronald Reagan talked about.
18
posted on
10/05/2007 7:06:19 AM PDT
by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
To: pissant
As always, Schlafly is the Queen of Mis-Info.
If you read the Hudson Institute report and you read what Schlafly says the report says, there is a lot of difference.
To: pissant
This is the actual hoped-for Legacy.
Leni
20
posted on
10/05/2007 7:06:55 AM PDT
by
MinuteGal
(Three Cheers for the FRed, White and Blue !)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson