Skip to comments.
The Values Test [Dobson Will Back Third-Party if Giuliani is Nominated]
The New York Times ^
| October 4, 2007
| JAMES C. DOBSON
Posted on 10/04/2007 10:19:26 PM PDT by Soft Bigotry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 261-268 next last
To: american_ranger
Your post is
THE scummiest, most deplorable, vile I have read here at Free Republic.
Your words are unconscionable!...You are unconscionable!
161
posted on
10/05/2007 4:48:36 AM PDT
by
Guenevere
(Duncan Hunter...President '08)
To: Soft Bigotry
I wonder if Dobson isnt testing his own political power here; maybe he wants to run at the top of the ticket of this third party? I'm thinking you are correct. Dobson is starting to act like a grandstanding demogogue.
162
posted on
10/05/2007 4:48:37 AM PDT
by
6ppc
(It's torch and pitchfork time)
To: bvw
bvw: “Our hardest-working friends are our enemies! Bash friends! Bash Dobson!”
163
posted on
10/05/2007 4:49:38 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: COgamer
I totally agree with you. This is a conservative website. I don’t think any one even answered you.
164
posted on
10/05/2007 4:50:55 AM PDT
by
seemoAR
(Absolute power corrupts absolutely)
To: Soft Bigotry
Does Dobson seriously consider Mitt Romney to be an acceptable choice for President? What does Dobson think about Mitt Romney?
To: bigjoesaddle
There are times I briefly think a Christian third party is a good idea...then I remember we are up against Satan HERself. Well, if you literally believe Hillary Clinton is Satan, I think you'd have to go "Christian third party", right?
To: BibChr
bvw: “Don’t elect Hillery by omission! Vote the GOP. Fight for your candidate in the primary, support whomever wins the party nod. Otherwise bow before Queen Hillary and Consort Billy Jeff”
167
posted on
10/05/2007 4:55:52 AM PDT
by
bvw
To: Soft Bigotry
I hope Dobson doesn't encourage another party and end up handing the whole thing to Hillary.
Carolyn
168
posted on
10/05/2007 4:57:48 AM PDT
by
CDHart
("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
To: 6ppc
“I wonder if Dobson isnt testing his own political power here; maybe he wants to run at the top of the ticket of this third party?”
I don’t believe Dr. Dobson is interested in a presidential run. But what confuses me is that there are one or two alternative parties he should already know about and be interested in, if he’s thinking about endorsing a third party.
To: Soft Bigotry
James Dobson 'contributes' to the right like Al Shaprton contributes to african americans. He's a poverty pimp of a different flavor, in it for himself.
He's not nearly as important as he cries out to be, plus, if there is any third party that takes off, it would be an independent Bloomberg run which could really cause electoral havoc to both of the two parties strategies
A pro-life single issue platform would be in a '4th' or '5th party' position. Barely a blip, a craction of a percent, not a double digit result.
170
posted on
10/05/2007 5:09:46 AM PDT
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
To: Brimack34
You can have Alito, Scalia, Roberts (who Giuliani specifically mentioned as the kind of justices he would nominate)
OR
Stevens, Ginsberg, or Kennedy
171
posted on
10/05/2007 5:12:21 AM PDT
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
To: Soft Bigotry
Ya know, I’m religous, I’m right-wing, and I don’t like Rudy Guiliani as Republican candidate for president (he’d be fine as a Democrat...). But I think this Dobson person is really full of himself.
Go Fred!
172
posted on
10/05/2007 5:12:54 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
To: Soft Bigotry
This makes me think less of Dobson. These “leaders” who think they have such power that they can influence what others think and do, have an inflated view of themselves.
To: Dustbunny
James Dobson
is not this guy
He's the equivalent of this fraud
174
posted on
10/05/2007 5:17:09 AM PDT
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
To: finnman69
Wikipedia says the Constitution Party is only on the ballot in 15 states, and not even as “the Constitution Party” in about half of those - so it’d have to be some sort of independent run, and I don’t know what the rules are on getting on the ballot that way.
To: Albion Wilde
See #139
And there is enough unrest to pull of a hijacking of the Republican conservative voters who are attracted to a “Conservative Republican Party.”
The bottom line, though, is that anyone who nominates Rudy DESIRES to lose to Hillary. They know that conservative Christians can never vote for a pro-abortion candidate.
They should switch to a candidate like Hunter, Huckabee, Thompson, who support life. As it stands, Rudy has zero chance of winning.
176
posted on
10/05/2007 5:17:26 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
To: Soft Bigotry
Why don’t you throw a temper tantrum there Dobbs?
Supporting a third party candidate will only help Hillary.
To: Soft Bigotry
History repeats. No lesson learned. Welcome Hillary and Socialism.
178
posted on
10/05/2007 5:21:48 AM PDT
by
Hattie
To: Ol' Sparky
Then, you're stating you'd rather be stuck without a chance at conservative President for eight years and are willing to see the Republicans lose considerably more seats in Congress and become an entrenched minority for, likely, a decade.So if FT is the great candidate being espoused so rabidly on every thread here, then why are so many here concerned about Rudy being nominated? This just doesn't make sense to me.
179
posted on
10/05/2007 5:33:21 AM PDT
by
Hattie
To: Albion Wilde
We got Bill Clinton because of Ross Perot.Wrong. We got Bill Clinton because we chose Bob Dole. If we get Hillary it will be because we chose Giuliani.
180
posted on
10/05/2007 5:38:39 AM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 261-268 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson