How horrible it must be to have been needlessly mutilated. I hope she wins.
1 posted on
10/04/2007 8:14:37 PM PDT by
Huntress
To: Mercat
2 posted on
10/04/2007 8:15:01 PM PDT by
Huntress
(Those who surrender liberty for security will have neither. --- Benjamin Franklin)
To: Huntress
Precursor indication of what we’re in for with the inevitable socialized medicine in this country-except that those who actually need the surgery won’t be able to get it.
To: Huntress
Never mind, dear, with the money you’ll get you’ll not only have the best cancer-free implants, but you’ll be such a rich woman that you won’t be single for long.
4 posted on
10/04/2007 8:19:27 PM PDT by
Fairview
( Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.)
To: Huntress
Winning is not even the situation here. She will probably bankrupt the company cleaning them out and the hospital, radiologist and everyone who was involved.
5 posted on
10/04/2007 8:22:45 PM PDT by
My Favorite Headache
(No One Gets To Their Heaven Without A Fight)
To: Huntress
The idea of getting two biopsies is stupid. Not needed for something that rarely occurs. I doubt seriously that this idea is going to become a standard of care. Two surgical procedures are not needed. There will always be human error. But two biopsies are not needed. Maybe a better system of checking and rechecking to make more sure the specimen is labled and processed correctly.
7 posted on
10/04/2007 8:27:17 PM PDT by
therut
To: Huntress
A little super glue can clear that right up.
8 posted on
10/04/2007 8:29:17 PM PDT by
Tall_Texan
(No Third Term For Bill Clinton!)
To: Huntress
How horrible it must be to have been needlessly mutilated. I hope she wins. I hope she wins, too...but we breast cancer survivors don't look on ourselves as "mutilated."
12 posted on
10/04/2007 8:43:14 PM PDT by
paulat
(I'd rather spend my vote on someone who CAN ACTUALLY BE ELECTED)
To: Huntress
But in a statement, CBLPath Medical Lab said, "The New York State Department of Health found no systemic problems and no deficiencies were cited against the lab." I guess the Docs were just stupid as hell then, right?
13 posted on
10/04/2007 8:51:55 PM PDT by
calex59
To: Huntress
Gov’t healthcare (Hillary-care) would have saved this woman.
15 posted on
10/04/2007 9:00:50 PM PDT by
umgud
To: Huntress
Horrifying story, no doubt.
Though had it been a man having his nuts cut off in a cancer misdiagnosis... It would have been material for Comedy Central.
Funny that.
18 posted on
10/04/2007 9:07:51 PM PDT by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Huntress
Eason said she learned a valuable lesson from her terrible experience. "Second opinions are good but second biopsies are better." It's good she has a sense of humor about it but she's right. Imagine what would happen under a socialised system. At least in our system, she can seek damages. If the gov't becomes the health provider, you won't be able to hold them accountable for such gaffes.
24 posted on
10/04/2007 9:47:11 PM PDT by
Tamar1973
(Riding the Korean Wave, one BYJ movie at a time! (http://www.byj.co.kr))
To: Huntress
How much would each boob be worth. hmmm, might almost be worth it. Get them replaced with new perky ones.
26 posted on
10/05/2007 6:02:53 AM PDT by
Mercat
(first president we can't spill water on?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson